Author Topic: 9/11: ITS OVER OSAMA BIN LADEN WINS (Read 7480 times)

ABlockOfCheese · September 11, 2015, 12:38:11 AM

Quote from: Planr on September 11, 2015, 12:34:02 AM

What Block of Cheese is failing to take into account is that the WTC builds were hit by 767s. When the buildings were first made almost half a century ago they were designed to withstand impacts only from planes about as big as a 707.

http://edition.cnn.com/2001/US/09/12/wtc.architect.cnna/

i still stand by my belief that it wasn't enough to take the towers down. I've done plenty of research but it would be too time consuming to dig up all my sources. take it as you wish.

Quote from: stufflord on September 11, 2015, 12:34:34 AM

then there is nothing else to argue
regardless of design there are still multiple variances that are not addressed with he age of the building and the differences in the planes
the weight of the plane in the building is already many tons on top of the straining section of impact

the weight of the plane is marginal compared to the weight of the structure and the loads it was designed to withstand.

honestly i don't really see why we are still here. you arent convincing me and im not convincing you so im done dealing with you.

Ad Bot · Advertisement

Ragequit · September 11, 2015, 12:42:09 AM

dude

it shouldn't be that hard to believe that a huge airliner completely forgeted the supports

ABlockOfCheese · September 11, 2015, 12:42:56 AM

Quote from: Ragequit on September 11, 2015, 12:42:09 AM

dude

it shouldn't be that hard to believe that a huge airliner completely forgeted the supports

ive already argued against this once tonight, im not going to do it again

Ragequit · September 11, 2015, 12:45:27 AM

ok cool

shitlord · September 11, 2015, 12:46:12 AM

Quote from: Ragequit on September 11, 2015, 12:45:27 AM

ok cool

I need to start doing this and stop splurging for 3 pages every thread :/

Decepticon · September 11, 2015, 12:49:36 AM

Quote from: ABlockOfCheese on September 11, 2015, 12:42:56 AM

ive already argued against this once tonight, im not going to do it again

one of the bases of your argument were the towers being reinforced

then it was proven that they were obsolete

another portion of your argument is that there were a bunch of loud booms, but it isn't really all that rare for a building to make booming noises when it begins collapsing and it's floor's supports start to buckle

them falling quickly was also explained in the way they fell, which was more or so to their side, being why they fell so quickly

your unignited thermite thing is 'supposed', so i'm going to assume it's not really a proven fact

this isn't really an argument worth continuing from here

CypherX · September 11, 2015, 12:53:17 AM

he's right

jet fuel cannot melt steel beams. steel's melting point is higher than the temperature at which jet fuel burns

except steel support beams don't need to be molten metal to fail; sufficiently heated metal is ductile enough to bend and fail, especially under the handicappedly forgethueg amount of weight that the beams would be holding up. deformation from a plane slamming into them at 465 miles per hour also played a significant role

ABlockOfCheese · September 11, 2015, 12:54:55 AM

Quote from: Decepticon on September 11, 2015, 12:49:36 AM

one of the bases of your argument were the towers being reinforced

then it was proven that they were obsolete by reinforced i dont mean that the towers were updated years after construction, i mean that the building materials used included concrete with steel in it for extra strength

another portion of your argument is that there were a bunch of loud booms, but it isn't really all that rare for a building to make booming noises when it begins collapsing and it's floor's supports start to buckle you can tell when the booms are from buckling supports and when they are from timed, controlled explosives

them falling quickly was also explained in the way they fell, which was more or so to their side, being why they fell so quicklythey hardly fell to their sides, they nearly fell straight down. obviously they would fall a little bit to their sides because of the change in weight distribution due to the impacts though.

your unignited thermite thing is 'supposed', so i'm going to assume it's not really a proven fact i had a source but i didnt favorite it before i exited chrome. that was several months ago anyways.