Author Topic: This is why I kept my views on feminism away from my family.  (Read 30104 times)

feminists believe in gender equality. some misandrists claim themselves to be feminists but they are not. also you are literally arguing against the definition
BECAUSE THE DEFINITION IS DESCRIPTIVE, NOT PROSCRIPTIVE. Here's why I'm against ideologies. You can compare feminism to a burlap sack. The sack has feminism's brand slapped right on the front. However, someone outside can reach into the sack to see what's in it, but they do not find any equality, only the opposite. But hey, the burlap sack clearly states that feminism is equality. I'm sorry if the brown townogy sounds a bit rushed. I'm currently multitasking.
Everything's a fallacy.
Even my willy is a logical phallucy.
Isn't calling people out on logical fallacies a fallacy in itself
No, you're thinking of the Fallacy Fallacy, which states that simply because an argument contains a fallacy, does not mean that it's actually incorrect. I did further explain how he was incorrect, though.
Yes. this does not mean that feminism has anything do with misandry. that's individual people being handicapped, not the movement being wrong. there's a difference. the loud minority is not the silent majority.
What is the movement made up of? Of course not all feminists hate men. However, you cannot downplay that as a "loud majority", implying that these are just a few oddballs or that they're "not real feminists", which you have not actually claimed, but the point still stands. The movement is still toxic, nonetheless. If the subject of your "grievances" can be replaced with Jews and sound like something out of Mein Kampf, maybe it's time for reformation. Feminism as a whole is too broad to attack right now, but I will address each individual subtopic that is brought to me.

Some misandrists claim themselves to be feminists but they are not.

And about a good 90% of feminists are misandrists. Your movement has been coopted, there's no denying it at this point.

And about a good 90% of feminists are misandrists. Your movement has been coopted, there's no denying it at this point.
Where's that statistic from?

if you're a misandrist, you cannot be a feminist
is this really such a hard concept


if you're a misandrist, you cannot be a feminist
is this really such a hard concept
feminists believe in gender equality. some misandrists claim themselves to be feminists but they are not. also you are literally arguing against the definition
This is a No True Scotsman fallacy as well, but the logic does not hold. Every feminist I've ever met claims that their brand of feminism is "real feminism" or "true feminism". HOW CAN THIS BE SOUND LOGIC?

I don't know man, I've seen extremists call themselves just about everything.

if you're a misandrist, you cannot be a feminist
is this really such a hard concept

According to you. Not according to most of the movement.

No, you're thinking of the Fallacy Fallacy, which states that simply because an argument contains a fallacy, does not mean that it's actually incorrect. I did further explain how he was incorrect, though.
Where did you explain it? All I saw was some brat screaming about how the evil women want to be treated equally.
And about a good 90% of feminists are misandrists. Your movement has been coopted, there's no denying it at this point.
95% of statistics are made up on the spot.

yes sorry
It's okay, I can forgive you and I'm sorry too.
It's good to be men and not evil women.

I don't know man, I've seen extremists call themselves just about everything.
Totally agree,that's actually not sarcasm you can call yourself a "gay loving Christian who loves and accepts everyone"
Where in reality you're a homophobic Christian who hates and has no mercy to anyone

Where's that statistic from?

I pulled it out of my ass. It's a rough estimate and a pretty generous one at that.

Where did you explain it? All I saw was some brat screaming about how the evil women want to be treated equally.
I explained how the logic is not and cannot be sound. I never said anything else about what you just said, Mr. Strawman. I want you to tell me how women in America and the first world are inequal.

This is a No True Scotsman fallacy as well, but the logic does not hold. Every feminist I've ever met claims that their brand of feminism is "real feminism" or "true feminism". HOW CAN THIS BE SOUND LOGIC?
I explained how the logic is not and cannot be sound. I never said anything else about what you just said, Mr. Strawman. I want you to tell me how women in America and the first world are inequal.

I pulled it out of my ass. It's a rough estimate and a pretty generous one at that.
Estimate based on what data?