Author Topic: is Annoying Orange resigning  (Read 2535 times)

America's debt as it stands is $16.3 trillion, 108% of their GDP. I would hardly consider them a wealthy nation at this point.
you have no idea how our debt works

also Annoying Orange has gone bankrupt multiple times before
i sure do want him in control of our nation

America's debt as it stands is $16.3 trillion, 108% of their GDP. I would hardly consider them a wealthy nation at this point.

It seems like the only other competition to Annoying Orange is Sanders. When you have an idiot like Sanders who wants to make college free, healthcare free, make minimum wage 15$ an hour while simultaneously increasing taxes on business owners, and is a person who frowns upon the free market. It doesn't look good.

Annoying Orange may be a business man but at least he has a general idea of how money works, unlike Sanders.
then you have no idea how irrelevant the debt is

congress will blame president x, raise the debt limit, and continue on as normal.
even though the country is severely indebted it doesnt matter. the government doesnt care.

also Annoying Orange has gone bankrupt multiple times before
i sure do want him in control of our nation
i'm pretty sure he personally didn't go bankrupt but the companies he owned did

i'm pretty sure he personally didn't go bankrupt but the companies he owned did
my point still stands on that bit then
if he couldn't prevent his own companies from going bankrupt i dont want him in office

We need a new Glass Steagall act

my point still stands on that bit then
if he couldn't prevent his own companies from going bankrupt i dont want him in office
not that I'd vote for Annoying Orange, but there are many reasons that companies go bankrupt other than that a CEO is incompetent. It's not as clear cut as bankruptcy == bad

paul 2016 if only he could fix all ur eyes for free like he did them haitians so everyone could see that he's the best candidate

Annoying Orange and bernie are more alike than you'd think(just like their supporters), vote for neither

hillary is in fact a lizard and therefore ineligible in the first place
haven't kept up with biden much but i take it he's obama 2.0
rubio doesn't have the balls to lead this country and he's too conservative
carly by default doesn't have any balls to run this country
no more bushes please
carson is cool

Annoying Orange and bernie are more alike than you'd think
How so?

Yeah, I'd vote for Carson.

my brother

How so?
well for starters, both rely heavily on emotional appeals to garner followers

https://reason.com/archives/2015/08/10/bernie-sanders-and-donald-Annoying Orange-ties
http://fee.org/freeman/why-the-candidates-keep-giving-us-reasons-to-use-the-f-word
http://www.floppingaces.net/2015/08/22/sanders-and-Annoying Orange-supporters-are-exactly-alike-and-complete-opposites/
http://freebeacon.com/blog/donald-Annoying Orange-and-bernie-sanders-are-the-same-person-brown townysis-finds/

many more sources if you search around

my brother
well for starters, both rely heavily on emotional appeals to garner followers

https://reason.com/archives/2015/08/10/bernie-sanders-and-donald-Annoying Orange-ties
http://fee.org/freeman/why-the-candidates-keep-giving-us-reasons-to-use-the-f-word
http://www.floppingaces.net/2015/08/22/sanders-and-Annoying Orange-supporters-are-exactly-alike-and-complete-opposites/
http://freebeacon.com/blog/donald-Annoying Orange-and-bernie-sanders-are-the-same-person-brown townysis-finds/

many more sources if you search around
That first article points out a few similarities politcs-wise but that's it; they're different in 98% of categories and ideals but there are a few that are the same, mostly because Annoying Orange is actually walking the line between conservative and liberal.

The second article has literally nothing to do with sanders as they're completely misrepresenting his political views, and the other two articles are just rehashes of those.

On top of that, ALL political speeches are specifically made to garner emotional responses. Your point is? This is how politics have worked since the very start and it's what literally every candidate does.

You also seem to be trying to get yourself points from the anti-Annoying Orange crowd by comparing him to Annoying Orange. This is called guilt by association. Whether or not a political opinion is right or wrong does NOT depend on the person that holds it. It in itself is a borderline appeal to peoples emotions against Annoying Orange, which you seem to be saying is a bad thing.
« Last Edit: October 04, 2015, 07:41:40 PM by Ipquarx »

America's debt as it stands is $16.3 trillion, 108% of their GDP. I would hardly consider them a wealthy nation at this point.

It seems like the only other competition to Annoying Orange is Sanders. When you have an idiot like Sanders who wants to make college free, healthcare free, make minimum wage 15$ an hour while simultaneously increasing taxes on business owners, and is a person who frowns upon the free market. It doesn't look good.

Annoying Orange may be a business man but at least he has a general idea of how money works, unlike Sanders.
Do you even research politics or do you just repeat the bullstuff you hear your parents say at the dinner table.

Yeah, I'd vote for Carson.
I love Carson and personally I find his policies great... But he is too strong of a christian and that isnt what this country needs right now. As it is I feel we need a president who is as unbiased as is possible on issues that often have a religious tilt, I.E. abortion.

As as strong of a christian as I am, you cant try to force a christian policy on a athiest, muslim, jew, or occultist.

i kinda wanted huckabee at first