Author Topic: Officially of legal drinking age  (Read 5992 times)

because you thought i was the op, when i wanted to share my 2 cents to the current discussion.
So you're salty that I made a simple mistake? Get over it, it's already been cleared up.

One of a kind
Most people I know prefer stick shift

wikipedia is not a reliable source
how about you show me a .edu or .org

IIRC more Americans get around via cars than in Europe. It's a lot more common in Europe to use trains, buses, and bikes, than in America.
That is most likely true since I use the train from time to time usually to visit a friend or go to Antwerp. Anyway that still holds the fact car accidents are double as much, even triple than in most europian countries.
wikipedia is not a reliable source
how about you show me a .edu or .org
Thats bullstuff and you know it.
It has fewer mistakes than an encyclopedia
« Last Edit: October 14, 2015, 03:40:19 PM by espio100 »

yeah except i can go edit it right now and change something on it

yeah except i can go edit it right now and change something on it
Except that only egoistic forgettwats would do that to prove a point about some stupid discussion

then obviously its not a reliable source
a friend of mine make a joke about bingo on the UVB 76 article and it stayed there for like two weeks

Except that only egoistic forgettwats would do that to prove a point about some stupid discussion

Waking up at 2 PM after going to bed at 3:30 AM, I can honestly say seeing this being 9 pages made me laugh to myself.

I did not expect to have unintentionally set off a stuff fest of drugs vs alcohol and honestly, I am not even mad this got derailed as it is quality entertainment watching the stupid as forget espio prove even further he's useless in any society he lives in weather it be Europe or America, he would be an unwanted pest.

Otherwise, thanks to those for the wishes and suggestions!

then obviously its not a reliable source
a friend of mine make a joke about bingo on the UVB 76 article and it stayed there for like two weeks
Still more reliable than a encyclopedia

the stupid as forget espio prove even further he's useless in any society he lives in weather it be Europe or America, he would be an unwanted pest.
cunt
« Last Edit: October 14, 2015, 03:49:51 PM by espio100 »

Still more reliable than a encyclopedia
what

explain to me how an encyclopedia written by educated and reliable sources is less reliable than some internet website that anyone can edit at any time

what

explain to me how an encyclopedia written by educated and reliable sources is less reliable than some internet website that anyone can edit at any time
Proven fact

I don't agree with stufflord here but

Also go jump of a cliff while you're at it.
forget you, stop being a piece of stuff


Not sure if this discussion is still going on, but thankfully as a university student I get free access to academic papers.
https://mega.nz/#!Wxh1nQYQ!48kvvUvLn7NSoDFReE0wj3SSS_NP0 2fpVxk4f2aFq4E
This is a paper from 2013 of around 50,000 people and assessed the dangers associated with use of marijuana and lung cancer.
"At the baseline conscription assessment, 10.5% (n=5,156) reported lifetime use of marijuana and 1.7% (n=831) indicated lifetime use of more than 50 times, designated as ‘‘heavy’’ use. Cox regression brown townyses (n=44,284) found that such ‘‘heavy’’ cannabis smoking was significantly associated with more than a twofold risk (hazard ratio 2.12, 95 % CI 1.08–4.14) of developing lung cancer over the 40-year follow-up period, even after statistical adjustment for baseline tobacco use, alcohol use, respiratory conditions, and socioeconomic status."

So basically, it's not nearly as bad as cigarettes but it's still going to give you an increased chance of lung cancer.

wikipedia is not a reliable source
how about you show me a .org


stuff i didnt see that
my other points about Wikipedia stand