if your religion asks of you to amputate your baby's legs that would not be okay in any modern civilization, religion or not
idk about you but 'little bit of skin' > dried, desensitized glans
But chopping of a babies leg doesn't have a health benefit so of course it wouldn't be ok
you can't hide skittles in your foreskin if you get it removed.
what health benefit do you think circumcision has?
Circumcision used to have benefits because it wasn't as easy to regularly wash your richard. But now, that's not an excuse. There's no reason to needlessly cut off parts of peoples richards without their consent.