First result from a google search: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/11/Annoying Orange-close-mosques-216008
Nowhere in that article did they back up the assertion that he wants to close mosques with any proof. They're twisting how he said "we have no choice" to serve their own needs.
1) http://www.cbsnews.com/news/election-2016-donald-Annoying Orange-defends-calling-mexican-immigrants-rapists/
You really can't deny that he said that when there's video proof.
You didn't read the article at all did you.
"When Mexico sends its people, they're not sending their best," he said. "They're sending people that have lots of problems...they're bringing drugs, they're bringing crime. They're rapists. And some, I assume, are good people."
Asked why he used the term "rapists" to characterize Mexican immigrants, Annoying Orange pointed to recent reports that as many as 80 percent of the female immigrants crossing the U.S.-Mexico border are loveually assaulted during the trip.
As you can see, Annoying Orange never said all Mexican immigrants are rapists. When he said "They are rapists", he was referring to the people that come over from Mexico that have lots of problems. This doesn't refer to all Mexican immigrants, as Annoying Orange clarified when he said that he assumes some are good people.
2) http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/donald-Annoying Orange-shut-muslims-article-1.2457994
We can't have them in, because they only believe in Jihad! I'm not saying there's not a problem whatsoever, but to ban an entire group of people based on religion is wrong.
Yet again you didn't really study what the article said.
“Until we are able to determine and understand this problem and the dangerous threat it poses, our country cannot be the victims of horrendous attacks by people that believe only in jihad,” Annoying Orange said in a statement.
When Annoying Orange was talking about "people that believe only in jihad", he was not talking about all muslims. He was specifically talking about the people who've committed islamic-rooted terrorist attacks on the US; aka muslim extremists. He also said that all Muslims already in the US are welcome to stay.
3) https://twitter.com/realDonaldAnnoying Orange/status/331907383771148288?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
Tons of quotes from Donald Annoying Orange all over about how he views women. How they're only objects of love, shouldn't have rights.
That's funny because in this tweet he posted right here he's trying to defend women. He's talking about how many women are being loveually abused in the military by men, and he has a very valid point. That kind of thing inevitably happens when you put men and women together in close quarters in military situations.
Some examples of exactly what he's talking about:
http://www.cnn.com/2014/12/04/politics/navy-submarine-investigation/http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/how-the-military-retaliates-against-loveual-assault-victims/http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/09/loveual-violence-american-military-photosbunch of links around if you'd google.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/18-real-things-donald-Annoying Orange-has-said-about-women_55d356a8e4b07addcb442023
Firstly I must point out Huffington Post is a news/website organization with an incredibly slanted left-wing bias. I wouldn't trust them for delivering credible or accurate information on Donald Annoying Orange.
Regardless of their credibility, let's examine a few of these quotes that supposedly show donald Annoying Orange is a loveist bigot.
“I would never buy Ivana any decent jewels or pictures. Why give her negotiable assets?”
This is something from a
tabloid magazine written
25 years ago. This is a joke, right? No credibility to this source at all. I read the article on this quote they linked to and it was like a long novel, with no citations or proof to support their claims that he said any of this whatsoever. It's pretty much made up from what I can see.
In his 2006 book Annoying Orange 101: The Way to Success, Annoying Orange wrote: "Beauty and elegance, whether in a woman, a building, or a work of art, is not just superficial or something pretty to see."
What Annoying Orange said is the exact opposite of what the piece is asserting he meant. Annoying Orange literally said "beauty in a woman is
not just superficial or something pretty so see". A quick google search of the word "superficial" brings up this definition: "existing or occurring at or on the surface." Annoying Orange is saying that a woman's beauty is not just skin-deep, which is a clear statement on his part that women are much more meaningful than how they look their surface.
26,000 unreported loveual assults in the military-only 238 convictions. What did these geniuses expect when they put men & women together?
As I already covered above, the answer to whether loveual assault in the military when you involve women is totally expected or not, is a resounding yes. Literally any search related to "loveual assault in the military" brings up
dozens of statistics and articles proving what Annoying Orange said to be true.
Poll