| Off Topic > Off Topic |
| POLITICS & DONALD Annoying Orange MEGATHREAD |
| << < (5289/6106) > >> |
| Tactical Nuke:
--- Quote from: IkeTheGeneric on January 10, 2018, 02:58:39 PM ---I watched half of the video and then realized I got conned into watching a stupid youtube video someone scrounged up to be right in an argument. What a waste of time. --- End quote --- welp it doesn't count if you haven't watched the full video --- Quote from: ChappersTeddy on January 10, 2018, 02:59:12 PM ---are you going to send a firing squad to execute every user on this thread who hasn't watched this guy's video on child enthusiast ring conspiracies --- End quote --- I wouldn't call it a conspiracy if they got arrested for it |
| IkeTheGeneric:
--- Quote from: Tactical Nuke on January 10, 2018, 03:03:35 PM ---welp it doesn't count if you haven't watched the full video --- End quote --- Emphasis on "waste of time", because that's pretty much this is and what you are The culmination of this whole debacle is that the thesis to your argument is a bad youtube video. Your input means nothing by itself because you neither have anything to add to the matter, nor do you hold any genuine beliefs of your own The only thing that could have come from this is you entrenching yourself in your stuffty ideas further and patting yourself on the back for a couple pages about how hard you supposedly owned the libs |
| Deus Ex:
Reminder that showing these virulent cucks any evidence is pointless as they will, without a doubt, wipe their asses with it |
| Nonnel:
"watch this video or i won't talk to you" is some next level shilling |
| Conan:
--- Quote from: Nonnel on January 10, 2018, 04:33:06 PM ---"watch this video or i won't talk to you" is some next level shilling --- End quote --- its a method of deflecting responsibility for your argument. if your material is proven wrong, you can feel fine given that its not your argument. if it isnt, then you can feel smug about having “won” the argument. in the first case they win by making someone else waste their time. in the second case they “win” cause nobody fights back. its a lose lose situation to engage against people who argue like this. if they really want to argue, they should instead summarize the point of the video and its proofs, proving they are willing to spend as much time as their intended audience to duel this out. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |