| Off Topic > Off Topic |
| POLITICS & DONALD Annoying Orange MEGATHREAD |
| << < (625/6106) > >> |
| Psych36:
--- Quote from: Ipquarx on July 27, 2016, 11:17:54 PM ---Dude, I said nothing about our current screening process or how it is or is not bad. I said we have the resources to put in place a good screening system like one Canada did. And the "cost to taxpayers" is not known currently but it can easily be less than 1.2 billion over the course of 6 years which is absolutely nothing, assuming they do a little creative thinking on getting the cost down And like I said, again, they cannot make any law targeted at muslims. They can target it at an entire country, or a nationality, but not a religion. --- End quote --- Okay? What i've been saying my last three posts is that they can prevent people from known terror hotspots and warzones from coming into the USA regardless of religion. I hope you realize as a sovereign nation we can prevent access or block refugees from coming into the country. And the five year cost of 39,000 refugees is closer to $3 billion over the course of 6 years which is a lot of money that could be spent on the citizens of this country.. After all they're the taxpayers dollars. |
| Ipquarx:
--- Quote from: Psych36 on July 27, 2016, 11:27:52 PM ---And the five year cost of 39,000 refugees is closer to $3 billion over the course of 6 years --- End quote --- Clearly not because Canada just did it for nearly 3 times less. And again, there's no point in denying everyone from a given area. Put them through a strict screening process like Canada did. We had no problems, you guys won't either. |
| Psych36:
--- Quote from: Ipquarx on July 27, 2016, 11:33:12 PM ---Clearly not because Canada just did it for nearly 3 times less. And again, there's no point in denying everyone from a given area. Put them through a strict screening process like Canada did. We had no problems, you guys won't either. --- End quote --- Okay, but we weren't discussing whether there was a point or not just that it could be done despite the obvious point of importing a toxic culture and potential terror. And that's great that it costed 3x less to settle them in Canada but it's gonna cost us a fortune since her plan requires we take in hundreds of thousands of new refugees and that it's been projected to cost $2.5 billion per 39,000 refugees over the course of five years and we're letting in hundreds of thousands. I'm also sure resettling them in Canada doesn't cost the same as it does to resettle them into America since the processes are different. The cost of resettlement includes heavy welfare use by Middle Eastern refugees; 91 percent receive food stamps and 68 percent receive cash assistance. Costs also include processing refugees, assistance given to new refugees, and aid to refugee-receiving communities. (http://cis.org/High-Cost-of-Resettling-Middle-Eastern-Refugees) |
| Ipquarx:
--- Quote from: Psych36 on July 27, 2016, 11:38:23 PM ----snip- --- End quote --- You realize the entire point of the screening that Canada did was to get rid of the toxic ones and potential terror, and the lazy and unwilling-to-integrate ones, right? $1.2bn over 6 years for 50,000 refugees who got jobs and are not toxic to the values that we as a nation care about. That's what the cost was. |
| Psych36:
--- Quote from: Ipquarx on July 27, 2016, 11:44:27 PM ---You realize the entire point of the screening that Canada did was to get rid of the toxic ones and potential terror, and the lazy and unwilling-to-integrate ones, right? $1.2bn over 6 years for 50,000 refugees who got jobs and are not toxic to the values that we as a nation care about. That's what the cost was. --- End quote --- You do realize that the screening process isn't foolproof at all? Terror attacks are still happening around the globe despite "intense screenings". You've also completely glossed over the point that there is no point in America taking refugees we've already taken in thousands of refugees, but how many have the wealthy gulf monarchies that share more cultural similarities, religious views, and have vast wealth? Not to mention that Saudi Arabia has thousands of air conditioned tents that they can provide refugees with that are not occupied. Obama has a plan in motion to take in tens of thousands why should we take in hundreds of thousands? http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/sep/15/saudi-arabia-has-100000-air-conditioned-tents-sitt/ |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |