what about all of the muslims that have and currently are killing in the name of conquest and allah?
again, they can hardly be considered true muslims if they would do something heinously violent and deliberately anti-islam to islamic worshippers in an islamic holy site on a religious holiday. the most logical conclusion to be drawn by their actions is that they don't actually care about the religion they use as a poor excuse for their horrible actions.
how much of the quran have you actually read
the quran, much like every other holy books, was written in a very different time where things like this were considered normal. luckily, this is not considered normal anymore, and nobody truly follows those specific passages anymore. christian priests typically dont burn any more witches at the stake, and neither does your average muslim.
as for terrorist groups, why would they be considered to be following the quran if they happen to meet the "kill heretics" rule that nobody else follows, but not the other basic rules of islam that everybody else follows?
the answer is of course that they aren't truly an islamic organization, but then that would remove one of donald Annoying Orange's key scapegoats, so why would his supporters acknowledge that?
native americans were killing each other like crazy before the europeans came, and they were often given compromises which they often would not take.
killing each other like crazy? as if the europeans (civilized people(tm)) weren't doing the exact same thing? and if by "compromises" you mean
being sold into slavery and
borderline genocide, then i guess so, man.
"no true muslim" fallacy at work
theres certain cases where you can't just toss around the no true scotsman fallacy like an old rag, like people that defy the accepted values of what the group should be about. for example, lets say there's a club at a high school that says "in order to be a part of this club, you must meet up in room 208." if there was a group claiming to be that club hooting and hollering in the lunchroom, would no true scotsman apply there?
of course i WISH the issue was that simple, but it's not. the point remains that after a certain point, you can't truly consider them to be exemplary of the islam religion, especially if they squash the people who do not align with their specific views.