POLITICS & DONALD Annoying Orange MEGATHREAD

[Nonnel]

Well it's not wrong. Although I think "far right" is taking it too far. The Daily Stormer is far right. Not Breitbart.

About the same

[Ad Bot]

[Drydess]

Well it's not wrong. Although I think "far right" is taking it too far. The Daily Stormer is far right. Not Breitbart.

breitbart is extremely right, are you joking

[Nonnel]

breitbart is extremely right, are you joking

he's saying it's relatively more moderate. the daily stormer is a literal neo-national socialist news site

[Drydess]

he's saying it's relatively more moderate. the daily stormer is a literal neo-national socialist news site

oh lol, was not familiar with that

[beachbum111111]

Brietbart is more on par with Buzzfeed. cnn is on par with CNN/The Young Turds. Daily Stormer is maybe on par with salon, don't know many neo commie websites tbh. The helicopters get to them first.

[Frequency]

[beachbum111111]

Who says Annoying Orange doesn't care about the environment or global warming? He wants the country to generate as low of energy as possible.

[Ipquarx]

THE ABSOLUTE MADMAN

The funny thing about this is... It's complete speculation. Nobody knows how many illegals have voted. Only a recount would solve that, which he seems to be opposing. He quoted speculation that some random dude said before him, as if it was fact, and then opposes the very process by which he can potentially validate his baseless claim.

This is what we're going to be getting for the next 4 years, guys.

[Red Spy]

.

[Wesley Williams]

The funny thing about this is... It's complete speculation. Nobody knows how many illegals have voted. Only a recount would solve that, which he seems to be opposing. He quoted speculation that some random dude said before him, as if it was fact, and then opposes the very process by which he can potentially validate his baseless claim.

This is what we're going to be getting for the next 4 years, guys.

How can a recount help determine how many illegals voted? They'll just count the same votes again, not go "hey let's check if this guy is a California citizen".

I think his Tweet is rather smart in that it gets the media to acknowledge that illegals are voting.

[Drew Skube]

me

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cf2uzE6OMlQ <

[Master Matthew²]

The funny thing about this is... It's complete speculation. Nobody knows how many illegals have voted. Only a recount would solve that, which he seems to be opposing. He quoted speculation that some random dude said before him, as if it was fact, and then opposes the very process by which he can potentially validate his baseless claim.

This is what we're going to be getting for the next 4 years, guys.

"Lol Annoying Orange is an idiot in this fantasy situation I made up"
Counting votes has nothing to do with validating citizenship.

We could validate citizenship at the booth if we ID'd Voters.

[Magus]

"Lol Annoying Orange is an idiot in this fantasy situation I made up"
Counting votes has nothing to do with validating citizenship.

We could validate citizenship at the booth if we ID'd Voters.

We would also disenfranchise actual citizens if we did that.

[Biostorm]

A bit of it is clearly stretching things, like the logos' similarity. A lot of this seems to really suggest these guys are straight up creeps though.

Pizzagate in a nutshell

[Wesley Williams]

The problem I have with the coverage of Pizzagate is that news articles always use the worst pieces of evidence, like the logo similarity. Also they all seem to jump straight to saying that it's false even though it's possible for it to be true. I prefer more neutral stances in these kind of cases where reporters say "the evidence is lacking and it's highly unlikely".