n korea might blow up s korea with nuke because US and s korea playing soldier

[Nonnel]

un's goal is to keep himself in power, not just to mess with everyone

[Ad Bot]

[Alyx Vance]

un's goal is to keep himself in power, not just to mess with everyone

He's going to be the ruler of a pile of ash if he keeps it up

[Otis Da HousKat]

un's goal is to keep himself in power, not just to mess with everyone

Thought you meant the United Nations until I realized you were abbreviating his given name lol.


But ya, this kind of posturing is as much to threaten other nations as it is to keep remembers of his own party and military in check and obedient. There are more than a handful of people who would like to take over control.

[espio100]

ITS TIME TO STOP KIMMY
NO MORE
WHERE THE forget ARE YOUR PARENTS?
probably dead

[Otis Da HousKat]

ITS TIME TO STOP KIMMY
NO MORE
WHERE THE forget ARE YOUR PARENTS?
probably dead

His parents are definitely dead. It is the reason he is in power.

[kanew2000]

if north korea fired a rocket at south korea even south korea wouldn't suffer from a nuclear fallout

dayum

[Bisjac]

Nukes now could never be isolated.
If 1 nation used one, all would.

[Nonnel]

He's going to be the ruler of a pile of ash if he keeps it up

The only way he has of staying in power is isolating his country. The only way he has of keeping people, inside and outside of his country, in line is by force. He's doing everything he can to keep his cushy life as overlord of a couple million people

[IkeTheGeneric]

If 1 nation used one, all would.

Because a crazy country with crazy leaders using a nuclear bomb would make every other nation forget about self-preservation and nuclear arms laws to bomb people because reasons

not only is it against everyone's interest to use a nuke on anyone I'm pretty sure everyone understands how mutually assured destruction works

[Dannu]

I'm pretty sure everyone understands how mutually assured destruction works

Judging by the amount of countries who possess and maintain nuclear deterrents, I wouldn't be so sure about that last part.

[Jairo]

Because a crazy country with crazy leaders using a nuclear bomb would make every other nation forget about self-preservation and nuclear arms laws to bomb people because reasons

not only is it against everyone's interest to use a nuke on anyone I'm pretty sure everyone understands how mutually assured destruction works

that's why we're wary of groups with nothing to lose who might acquire nukes (CIA) or people invading others without a nuclear deterrent (russia and ukraine situation)

[IkeTheGeneric]

that's why we're wary of groups with nothing to lose who might acquire nukes (CIA) or people invading others without a nuclear deterrent (russia and ukraine situation)

Exactly. I'm not so sure that every developed country would be brandishing nukes and launching at everyone willy nilly if any of the problem groups were to launch their own payloads, but then again Bisjac probably didn't think too hard before posting

[Blockchip]

Watch Vinesauce streams for an hour.

[Bisjac]

Exactly. I'm not so sure that every developed country would be brandishing nukes and launching at everyone willy nilly if any of the problem groups were to launch their own payloads, but then again Bisjac probably didn't think too hard before posting

Its nato vs "the other block"
Several nuclear countries would nuke us for using a nuke on n Korea ir anywhere in the world, thus setting off everyone to use em. Thats also why n Korea having them is so bad, because they alone could trigger the use by everyone in an instant.
That is how it works.

[Satan From Wreck-It-Ralph]

Watch Vinesauce streams for an hour.

wha... what???