It's amazing that the amount of ignorance in your post is only dwarfed by your ego. Your argument tactics are that of a crumpling politician. (Let me guess, your going to try to make me seem like you now aren't you?)
That's not true. Maybe everything you've 'quoted' is supposed to be based on something i said, but that doesn't mean all of them are something i said.
And once again, your too blind trying to be "right" then trying to see reality, if we go back through the thread, (as I said) we will clearly see that pretty much everything we've quoted you on you have said. (Except for the "I'm a imbecile part", even though is true).
Clearly you don't want to take responsibility for your actions, as we can see from the way you try to make me seem like you.
You are trying desperately to try and take focus off you. But failing miserably. Trying to run from the shadows when you are one.
They aren't 'evidence.
You essentially just quoted every post you saw that agreed with you in the last few pages.
So they're not evidence because their in my favor? Let me ask you. If they were in your favor, would you take those answers as evidence? Yes, yes you would. And honestly, even if we had screenshots from someone else. You still wouldn't take that as evidence, because they would see your actions and obviously choice the latter for who is at fault.
So like I predicted about 3-4 pages ago.
Your lying, because while you ask for evidence, once it's given. You deny it as such. Oh, you didn't say such words?
Liar:
but I don't currently think that, and in order to change my mind, you're going to have to make a convincing argument instead of just telling me 'you're wrong' and insisting that i change my mind.
I think you mean "i know you are but what am i.
Yes, that is what I mean. But it's not far off.
Also, what makes you so sure that you already 'know' why i'm posting in this thread?
Because I can see what your writing. And in what context your writing them in. It's not terribly hard to tell "why" someone is posting in a certain thread.
So if you want the short answer, because you've thrown yourself into battle with no weapons, nor any armor.
I am fully aware that if I were to walk up to a random black person on the street and call them a monday, they would probably be upset.
Then why did you do it to a random admin?
It was far more than one word off. Also, yes, even if it was one word off, it still wouldn't be what i said. One word is the difference between "I think i'm right" and "i think i'm wrong"
Have you ever heard of "synonyms"?
Even if it was two words off, it would (depending on what your saying, the context your saying it in) have the same meaning. Have you gotten to the point in school were your learning about synonyms yet?
Let me give you an example. "Your an imbecile" and "You are a imbecile" may be slightly different, but have the same meaning. Did you know that?
In short, their synonyms. This just shows how deep your thought process goes.
You think you're right. I also think i'm right. Please explain how these two cases are different without just saying "because we're right".
It's pointless, because no matter what evidence I give you. No matter how I phrase my sentence, you just see what I say as "because we're right". Making this a pointless and trick question.
One word is the difference between "I think i'm right" and "i think i'm wrong".
This would be true, if what we said weren't synonyms of what you said. But it isn't.
How is saying "...what?" a kindergarten like tactic?
I honestly think that saying this is more kindergarten-like and childish than anything you've said is kindergarten-like and childish:
This is the equivalent of "I know you are but what am I". (Again).
