If your concern lies with the preservation of everyone's human rights, due process, and "humanity" then your primary concern should probably be wiping Islamic ideology from the face of the planet because there's nothing further from it than Middle Eastern culture and Sharia Law. You don't have to kill or shun or imprison all the muslims to do this either. You just simply bar people from bringing toxic and dangerous ideologies into your country, and you vet the offenders who are already in your country. The "moderate muslims" everyone uses as an example of why we shouldn't "generalize" are just examples of semi-successfully assimilated muslims. The first step to reforming Islam is just accepting the fact that there is a loving problem with Islam and stop pretending that criticism of their ideology is "phobic" or a "stigma" or whatever the buzzword is.
like i said (or at least implied), it's much simpler than trying just to rationalize islam. this is demonstrating pretty well how people can balance their values in fundamentally different ways and reach vastly different conclusions. the bottom line for me is that i can't personally justify making broad assumptions, because that conflicts with my own personal interests. i imagine that you and people who feel the same way probably don't particularly care because it's generally useful to be broad when you're more concerned about safety. because it's better to be safe than to be sorry, and if you can eliminate anything that appears to be a risk, and you care enough about the threat at hand, it makes perfect sense that you would want to take any action possible.
it's not useful for me to think this way because it makes me feel
more unsafe and uncomfortable. for others i imagine it has an opposite effect. i don't avoid and discourage generalization cus i'm some hippy nerd that just thinks everyone should get along and be happy, i do it because i fear fractured, unbalanced, and unequal societies in my own home more than i fear temporary, volatile political turmoil mainly active across the world that's doomed to end from its start. don't get me wrong, i am absolutely afraid of terrorism, but i believe it to be a transient issue that can be solved conventionally. i don't feel like i need an enemy or an evil or a target, to me it's just a problem that needs a solution. it goes without saying, but again, obviously these are just the best that i can word my own problems, and i don't expect everyone to sympathise. in fact, i'm saying it specifically because i know people don't. i just think that this is ultimately the real source of disagreement, and all the layers on top are secondary. i'm not trying to convince anyone of anything here and i'm not really trying to put up arguments, i'm only laying out my basic inclinations in the broadest way i can for how they apply here