Author Topic: JitankIscigarette, Lord tony, PhantOS, Psych36, and anyone else fueling the "debate"  (Read 23875 times)

I thought your criticisms were fair. I did stray away from the original point which was stating that PhantOS and Jitank were being tribal, however it did take a different turn....

Anyways, I really don't see that I need to add anything to prove my point since they've already convinced everyone.
again, 'dont say monday' =\= racism

I thought your criticisms were fair. I did stray away from the original point which was stating that PhantOS and Jitank were being tribal, however it did take a different turn....

Anyways, I really don't see that I need to add anything to prove my point since they've already convinced everyone.
Just because you've convinced people that "were tribal" doesn't make it anymore true. You really have no valid evidence. If you were to actually look at my general post, you will find the ive said countless times that "we are no different from eachother execpt for skin color and geographical adapted features" and "black people deserve to be equal" but you cant seem to comprehend those two sentences.

while psych was mainly arguing with me, i don't really think he's that big of a problem

while he won't state his exact sources, he still gave examples statistics and who wrote the paper, and moreover is providing actual examples of his beliefs

so i support this drama except for psych. he seems like he's actually creating a reasonable argument in the debate, while tony goes: "BLACK PEOPLE SUCK" and jitank/path are like: "NUH UH"

while psych was mainly arguing with me, i don't really think he's that big of a problem

while he won't state his exact sources, he still gave examples statistics and who wrote the paper, and moreover is providing actual examples of his beliefs

so i support this drama except for psych. he seems like he's actually creating a reasonable argument in the debate, while tony goes: "BLACK PEOPLE SUCK" and jitank/path are like: "NUH UH"
what about the part where i provided actual sources, or does that not count. See the first page

what about the part where i provided actual sources, or does that not count. See the first page

he seems like he's actually creating a reasonable argument in the debate

see, i'm not trying to be rude here but a lot of your posts, to me, have been mostly: "look how discriminated against I am" versus psych trying to make genuine debate and reasons for his beliefs

i'm not saying that you aren't discriminated against, but what i am saying is that you're making racial issues more about yourself instead of your whole race, making your posts seem fairly self centered in comparison to the legitimate social advocacy that you could be asserting

again, 'dont say monday' =\= racism


WTF, don't words into my mouth. The term "monday" is derogatory and offensive and is a horribly tribal thing to say but it's the internet we aren't here to language police other people, eventually someone will say the word "monday" and you'll have to deal with it rather then play victim 24/7.

This thread is great. All the argumentative hotheads yelling at each  other in one place.

This thread is great. All the argumentative hotheads yelling at each  other in one place.


:( pls


WTF, don't words into my mouth. The term "monday" is derogatory and offensive and is a horribly tribal thing to say but it's the internet we aren't here to language police other people, eventually someone will say the word "monday" and you'll have to deal with it rather then play victim 24/7.
i already understood this. A) i was never acting tribal, B) i was never language policing anybody, C) i wasnt trying to play victim; one thing leads to another and people get to saying 'black people have it easy' to which i bring up points where we dont have it easy.

Its shameful that im the only one mentioning this, but half of sheep's argument was 'im offended that someone else is offended by an offensive word.' I never went in that thread to scream that black people were being oppressed, it simply evolved that way with sheep derailing it towards a white apologist accusation.

By the time ike debunked sheep's bullstuff, lord tony had started laying down his bait schemes and i fell for them

boy, you are 13 years old. You are the main one trying to discredit our personal experience with the world. You really dont know stuff kid. When you grow up and get a wider veiw of the world, you can come and argue.
You're in no loving position to say that.

see, i'm not trying to be rude here but a lot of your posts, to me, have been mostly: "look how discriminated against I am" versus psych trying to make genuine debate and reasons for his beliefs

i'm not saying that you aren't discriminated against, but what i am saying is that you're making racial issues more about yourself instead of your whole race, making your posts seem fairly self centered in comparison to the legitimate social advocacy that you could be asserting
well how can i make it seem less self-centered because im not trying to be.

Also, side note, i know i dont do things perfectly but sometimes i feel like alot of people on the forums single me out more when im doing something. Thats why im ussualy trying to defend myself so much. Maybe thats why my arguement seem selfcentered.


boy, you are 13 years old. You are the main one trying to discredit our personal experience with the world. You really dont know stuff kid. When you grow up and get a wider veiw of the world, you can come and argue.
oh stuff monday what are you doing

you act like a loving 10 year old because "oh my my melanin gives me such a hard time please feel bad for me and create a protest for me on an internet forum"
then when someone comes up with a valid and reasonable point on the issue you just loving go "lalallalalalalala i cant hear you" and ":^) haters gon hate xPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP"
loving shut up you have no reason to post your black lives matter stuff on this forum you're just being a complete loving handicap and anything coming out of your posts is just utter loving garbage

it's like an endless cycle of infection of drama topics

if we even mention a user or the argument the user is attended to, it will be derailed and focused back to what the user is arguing about

i think it did the same for this topic