Author Topic: Milwaukee Riots - Buildings, Banks, Gas Stations & Cars burning - Waukesha Ct.  (Read 14175 times)


I'm surprised Jitank isn't here telling us we are white scum for siding with the police on shooting an armed suspect.
As much as I know Jitank lives and breathes radical social justice, I doubt even he would attempt to justify something like this.

As much as I know Jitank lives and breathes radical social justice, I doubt even he would attempt to justify something like this.

He would.

lmao at people in this thread saying you should shoot rioters on the street
that's like saying you should fight fire with gasoline

lmao at people in this thread saying you should shoot rioters on the street
that's like saying you should fight fire with gasoline
if people put me or my family in danger they can catch a bullet to the lip i don't care what tf you say

lmao at people in this thread saying you should shoot rioters on the street
that's like saying you should fight fire with gasoline

These rioters were stopping cars for the sole purpose of dragging the drivers out and beating them up.

In that scenario you are legally allowed to defend yourself by killing the rioters.


Just like when a swarm of rioters surrounded a car and this lady drove through them. No charges were held.

if people put me or my family in danger they can catch a bullet to the lip i don't care what tf you say
that's different than ordering police to shoot rioters in the street though, there's a fine line between self-defense and escalating a dangerous situation

that's different than ordering police to shoot rioters in the street though, there's a fine line between self-defense and escalating a dangerous situation
The Chinese did the same thing during the Tianamen Square protests back in '89

that's different than ordering police to shoot rioters in the street though, there's a fine line between self-defense and escalating a dangerous situation
its fun to shoot blacks thoheheh

The Chinese did the same thing during the Tianamen Square protests back in '89
Those protests were more peaceful.



I cannot defend violent rioting. I also cannot defend using violence to stop them.
"This isn't some civil trial where all positions, all propositions, are equally valid until a judge decides which one is right. If we act like the Empire, we become the Empire." -Wedge Antilles, Starfighters of Adumar

that's different than ordering police to shoot rioters in the street though, there's a fine line between self-defense and escalating a dangerous situation

So let the city burn then?

Okay.

BLM is clearly a terrorist organization. stuff like this is just going to continue.

So let the city burn then?

Okay.
you don't ignore it you dipstuff you either comply with their demands or you contain the problem
Comply with the demands of terrorists? Oh wow, you'd make a great leader.

Killing them is containing the problem.
lol why do i even bother responding to you
« Last Edit: August 15, 2016, 02:12:14 AM by Drydess »

you don't ignore it you dipstuff you either comply with their demands or you contain the problem

Comply with the demands of terrorists? Oh wow, you'd make a great leader.

Killing them is containing the problem.

oh lord baloney back with the extremely edgy comments