I dont get why people compare BF1 and verdun (or any other 'realistic' ww game) other than wanting to start an argument or just wanting to throw stuff
This isn't about realism. This is about authenticity. I want a battlefield game that plays like WW1. Where most of the guns are bolt action and most of the vehicles are stuff giving infantry a fighting chance. Not loving Battlefield 4 with a WW1 paint job
it clearly says battlefield in the title, which is why the gameplay is so different from other games and never was meant to be realistic
Again, not realism, authenticity. Which is what the newer battlefield games are SUPPOSE to be about. Battlefield 1942 was a good WW2 game. Why can't they make a good WW1 game?
think of comparing COD infinite warfare and no man's sky just because they are space themed and first person shooters (prob nms not rly), they are totally different games
Not even close. Have fun stroking DICE's rooster.
ONTOPIC: The tanks are WAAAY too overpowered. Got 60-3 in Rush when I wouldn't get nearly that much otherwise. Tanks weren't even used that much in WW1 since they were unreliable. (and they were never really used by the Turks, who I was playing as).
Poll