Hillary Clinton Has Volunteer Event In Ohio no one showed up

[Ceist]

Spamming up my inbox 3 times shows otherwise.

Besides the title of the article is the title of the thread you could easily search for it.

i've said this before, if you want people to look at your topic and keep the discussion on point, post a source. + it's a start on the right path for you.

it's right there tony. right there bro.

[Ad Bot]

[Conan]

ceist just leave it tony's not gonna stop being tony

tftt

[c]

where's that mod that blocks tony's posts? I genuinely can't stand seeing his posts anymore.

"i dont want to see tonys post anymore"
*comes back to the thread to reply to every other post for the next two pages*

[Lord Tony®]

"i dont want to see tonys post anymore"
*comes back to the thread to reply to every other post for the next two pages*

It makes no sense.

[Lord Tony®]

it's right there tony. right there bro.

If people are that entitled to not start a real discussion because there is no source then they don't deserve a source.

Besides aren't news sources just a few loving paragraphs that are really vague?

I could literally copy and paste an entire article and you'll still cry for a source when that's the entire loving article.

[Lord Tony®]

And it's also been proven no one loving reads sources.

Because in another news threads I stated details directly from the source website. Then someone told me "huh where is your source, I never heard about that" and I loving said it's right loving there in the OP if you bothered to click the link for the full loving source and read it.

So no one reads the source material anyways. You people only literally check to see if its from loving Foxnews or some other bullstuff that doesn't matter, so you can find a way to dismiss it when it doesn't matter. Foxnews isn't loving buzzfeed.

[Rednakin]

You people only literally check to see if its from loving Foxnews or some other bullstuff that doesn't matter

You do realize that the news do not have the duty to tell the truth? If you're posting about an event, give an unbiased source, not breitbart, "western journalism", kool kids klubnights or any other stuff right wing websites.

[Ceist]

"i dont want to see tonys post anymore"
*comes back to the thread to reply to every other post for the next two pages*

well no one has helped me find the mod that blocks his posts. also these posts are unrelated to his random and handicapped political posts. i can bear him right now.

If people are that entitled to not start a real discussion because there is no source then they don't deserve a source.

Besides aren't news sources just a few loving paragraphs that are really vague?

I could literally copy and paste an entire article and you'll still cry for a source when that's the entire loving article.

seems like people are crying more for just the source, whether or not they read it is entirely up to them. stop being dumb.

[Lord Tony®]

You do realize that the news do not have the duty to tell the truth?

You do realize I'm not a journalist and I do not have the duty to provide source?

[Lord Tony®]

If you're going to complain about "unbiased sources" then maybe you should complain about the source, the journalist's source.

[Lord Tony®]

You should write foxnews or breitbart a letter telling them to get better sources if you actually care that much.

[Rednakin]

If you want to add more to your post, just edit it.

[e-maxx]

I'm convinced tony could have an entire conversation with himself

[Rigel]

I'm convinced tony could have an entire conversation with himself

[Lord Tony®]

If you want to add more to your post, just edit it.

You just ignored everything I said.