well, it could have if you consider how nearly every ancient culture across the world has a massive flood myth, and the existence of sea creature fossils high above sea level far off the shore of continents, and the presence of incredibly well-preserved fossil "graveyards" formed through catastrophically rapid sedimentation (volcanic eruptions aside), and the clearly rapidly-deposited strata of alike composition and age that stretch across different continents, and so on
do you have any sources on any of this at all? I googled the thing about fossils being found inland and, unsurprisingly, the only relevant thing I got was a christian blog-ish site that
does have sources for a few things it says, but not for any of the questionable assumptions it makes. for instance it says that the grand canyon has fossils in upper layers. ok, believable. but then it decides that the only reasonable explanation is a worldwide flood, and not, uh... the fact that the grand canyon was formed by a river. also
it's only like 6 million years old, whereas
the latest age of the mesozoic period was a whopping 66 million years ago. anything could've happened in that time, a worldwide flood is definitely not the only possibility
it also mentions the himalayas having fossils, but mount everest
is about 60 million years old? not seeing any sources there either, but it's the best I can find.
there's also this, which says the same things, and is at least hosted by scholastic and I'm sure they did their research
furthermore,
this site says the flood would've occurred in about 2304BC, only like 4000 years ago. which is just not long enough for fossils to form
lastly, the world would not have yet recovered from such a flood occurring only 4000 years ago. that would've led to the extinction of every land animal in the world, regardless of noah supposedly having two of each on the ark. how could he have even had every animal on board, anyway? what about a galapagos turtle? an american bison? how did he feed them all for 40 days? and what about plants? land plants would've died from that as well, and I've never even heard of him bringing plants on the ark. even sea animals and plants would be so adversely affected by the extinctions of all those that live on land (and just the crazy huge change in ecology that would occur from a global flood lasting 40 days) that many of them, too, would die out
