Author Topic: [NEWS] cnn aired 30 minutes of hardcore research  (Read 3038 times)

apparently it was also high quality.
when cnn forgets up they do it right.

apparently it was also high quality.
when cnn forgets up they do it right.

apparently it was also high quality.
when cnn forgets up they do it right.
see this really opens my eyes, because that means someone paid for hd research, and then like the true, god's given good samaritan he is he shared it to the world, for free! and does he ask for anything in return? no. his gift is the security in knowing he made everyone's holidays.... a bit more magical ;)

fake

Literally just Google it. I know people love to use that as their source around here, and in this case it's a good one.

doesn't look all that hardcore to me

ya snopes said it's fake

fake

Literally just Google it. I know people love to use that as their source around here, and in this case it's a good one.
well that makes sense lol, 30 minutes seemed a bit excessive

It's painfully obvious that it's fake.
Maybe 30 seconds sure, but 30 minutes?
The whole crew would need to be fired to have let it aired for 30 minutes.

From some experience working in broadcasting, the feed would've been cut no more than a second after going out, if going out at all; you can see what you're going to cut to before you cut, and it's not a one man job. You don't just press play and go grab some coffee until the next show starts, a whole team actively watches a wall full of monitors, consisting of live feeds, queued feeds, a series of playback machines, the feed being sent out before it's sent, and the feed being sent out after it's sent.

The only circumstance where another show could be sent out would be downstream of the broadcast station, therefore not a responsibility of CNN but instead a cable/satellite provider- which often also have feeds back to the broadcast station for further verification.

edit: it's also viewed by upstream supervisors at another location inbetween leaving the broadcast room and going public, who also have the ability to cut the feed.
« Last Edit: November 25, 2016, 07:05:38 PM by Scout31 »

doesn't look all that hardcore to me
ya they gotta ramp up their game

hol up

sorry for going so tinfoil on this but what if these big news sites are using it to further push the whole 'alternative news is fake news' thing that they've been trying to push lately

like it is possible they could use this and put the fake story blame on them

hol up

sorry for going so tinfoil on this but what if these big news sites are using it to further push the whole 'alternative news is fake news' thing that they've been trying to push lately

like it is possible they could use this and put the fake story blame on them
is fox news "alternative news?"

for I minute I thought we were talking about cartoon network here and I was like holy stuff what an absolute forget up

this is still a huge forgetup though, god damn
not everyone spends their time watching nothing but cartoons all day maxx

I was wary when I saw the OP had linked the dailymail

By that logic it's not gay if you forget a dude with boobs
Only if he's wearing makeup and he's crying

it's not gay if the richard's on a girl
but its boobs on a guy not richards on a girl