don't loving reply to that rambo
Dismissive post? Why even make a thread about me and open a discussion if you're going to be a closed minded bigot
emperor palpatine is next to me inching close to my ear telling me to reply by saying "do it" periodically and oh it's hard to resist.
bah I still have a few cents left anyways.
How do you know? Do you know the artists personally enough to be able to objectively define the purpose of their art?
cunt this isn't abstract art, this is a sub-category of research, regardless of what you say it's origin is explicitly, and only loveual, and always has been.
Also it's pretty sad you think that last pic I posted is loveual. Like a girl is literally about to be digested alive and you're still objectifying her.
The only objectifying being done here is by the artist when they drew her ass to be the center of attention/in the foreground.
trying to justify vore as not being in relation to loveual/erotic fantasies/special interestes when it's only relations are loveual/erotic fantasies/special interestes does nothing, and will do nothing, to uphold you and your stupid justifications as to it being purely art with no other referential material.
