Off Topic > Off Topic
Do you think Lolicon should be considered child enthusiasm?
Decepticon:
--- Quote from: HULKHOGANWWFWORLDCHAMPION on January 23, 2017, 09:48:08 PM ---then what should it be considered? bootleg child research?
--- End quote ---
how about we just consider it some degenerate weeb art and go on about our days because nobody actually got hurt
also are we discussing the morality or legality of lolicon? the titles a bit confusing
The Murderous Cop:
--- Quote from: HULKHOGANWWFWORLDCHAMPION on January 23, 2017, 09:48:08 PM ---thats the thing about loli, to people it's the next best thing and I don't think many people into loli just search up midget research, even then they would still have some sort of facial features that indicate that it's not a loving 6 year old
--- End quote ---
ok, i'm just gonna say this now, but 6 years old is like borderline toddlercon. and trust me, that's WAY loving worse
--- Quote from: HULKHOGANWWFWORLDCHAMPION on January 23, 2017, 09:48:08 PM ---then what should it be considered? bootleg child research?
--- End quote ---
...loli? the name it was given?
Ringabel:
--- Quote from: SeventhSandwich on January 23, 2017, 09:46:15 PM ---Pretty sure the defining feature of a child enthusiast is an attraction to young body features, not an attraction to people below age-whatever.
--- End quote ---
i always interpreted it as being underage and having those features but it's a pretty vague and controversial definition so YMMV
--- Quote from: beachbum111111 on January 23, 2017, 09:44:24 PM ---*Be a pilgrim*
"that 8 year old is actually a witch, lets rape her"
--- End quote ---
also this is a terrible brown townogy because a witch would just be burned, not raped. pretty sure loving a witch would give you some sort of terrible curse and send you to hell in pilgrim beliefs
--- Quote from: HULKHOGANWWFWORLDCHAMPION on January 23, 2017, 09:48:08 PM ---then what should it be considered? bootleg child research?
--- End quote ---
no, it should be considered explicit art because there's no actual child having love, it's victimless
beachbum111111:
--- Quote from: Ringabel on January 23, 2017, 09:51:59 PM ---i always interpreted it as being underage and having those features but it's a pretty vague and controversial definition so YMMValso this is a terrible brown townogy because a witch would just be burned, not raped. pretty sure loving a witch would give you some sort of terrible curse and send you to hell in pilgrim beliefsno, it should be considered explicit art because there's no actual child having love, it's victimless
--- End quote ---
>7th century peasant
>Child is having seizure
>"holy stuff that kid is possessed by a demon, better rape it out of her"
Bloody Mary:
It's already illegal in many parts of the world, including quite a few states here in the US. It may not be counted as child enthusiasm but it's still prosecutable in plenty of countries.