| Off Topic > Off Topic |
| What do new websites have that older ones didn't? |
| << < (3/6) > >> |
| Insert Name Here²:
--- Quote from: tab on January 26, 2017, 05:26:00 PM ---flashy moving stuff ≠ better functionality --- End quote --- Functionality as in smoothness, ease of use, user-friendly, non-headache inducing, features and tools, stuff like that. |
| tab:
--- Quote from: Insert Name Here² on January 26, 2017, 05:29:39 PM ---Functionality as in smoothness, ease of use, user-friendly, non-headache inducing, features and tools, stuff like that. --- End quote --- In all honesty, it sort of has the opposite effect on me. I don't see the need for websites to be any more than something like Newgrounds. All the other stuff feels like it bloats the site up. |
| DrenDran:
--- Quote from: tab on January 26, 2017, 05:38:57 PM ---In all honesty, it sort of has the opposite effect on me. I don't see the need for websites to be any more than something like Newgrounds. All the other stuff feels like it bloats the site up. --- End quote --- I agree, I'd be fine if many sites were basically Web 1.0 in nature. All websites should have to have a javascript free option for people to use. (And yes, I realize this means all data would have to be submitted via GET and POST calls) |
| Steve5451²:
it's not new versions of HTML, CSS, or JS, it's just that design choises change over time, and maybe our standards are being held higher so professionals are used instead of your typical nerd Steve. |
| Swollow:
i pref old websites back when it was a simpler land of web design <3 |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |