Author Topic: Magus terrible admin on medieval RP.  (Read 55263 times)

If the 5 other guards do try to kill you, you can kill them.

I guess it depends on which admin is my judge.

Might as well start appointing people a defense attorney.

I guess it depends on which admin is my judge.

Might as well start appointing people a defense attorney.

Good idea. Might I suggest these [url=http://vignette4.wikia.nocookie.net/aceattorney/images/a/a5/Athena_Cykes_Portrait.png/revision/latest?cb=2014062205045]7two?



My opinion on this situation remains that the only bad admin they had was Amir but then the rest are perfectly fine. I know the customer is always right, but realism isn't always right. And I say this as someone who goes out of his way to apply realism to others' sillyness as a joke.

People did get killed randomly fairly quick in the real medieval times but it wasn't fun for the person being killed, and it won't be any more fun in a video game either unless it deviates so much it isn't based on the real medieval times anymore.

The theme of Sapphire's Medieval RP is probably a more dramatic look that saves the combat for later, instead involving dialogue and non-lethal conflict. And some mystery. Combat, however isn't the only way to cause chaos or humor during the long talking times. How do I know, you ask? Because I've played there and seen people do it or did it myself.

Here's some things you can do, for the sake of example:
-Write a note at the palace that declares the king/queen wanted.
-Start a religion and spread it.
-Pretend to be drunk and talk gibberish to people.

These are just some of the actions you can perform that involve no blood spilling, yet will make the situation quite alive!

Don't know if this will be of any use to anyone, but it's my view.

I still can't believe I was falsely banned for "metagaming" now.

They downed you to ask! and as we didnt had contact at that moment, i reported the real RDMer but they didnt know so they still believed you were the RDMer. So we did both things you said. I demand they getting unbanned
The report did not come in until several minutes after they were banned. Further, the RDM rules are about attacking, not just killing. You may not shoot first and ask questions later.

Noedit: also, we require the victims to report RDM, as random witnesses are unlikely to know if the victim did anything to the attacker. Neither of them reported it.

The report did not come in until several minutes after they were banned. Further, the RDM rules are about attacking, not just killing. You may not shoot first and ask questions later.

It wasn't RDM by your own definition though, he gave reason for the attacking. It wasn't a random case of deathmatching.

They were shot at randomly, and did not report it, so no action was taken. They then chased down somebody who happened to be in the same area and was leaving town to head back to the fields (me). They did not say a word.
If you are confused over who to attack, don't.

Further consideration about the reason for their silence leads me to suspect they were metagaming in the form of using non-game means to communicate and coordinate their actions, which is also bannable.
Quote
10. No Metagaming/Ghosting
 - Do not communicate ANY in-character information through out-of-character context.
       + This includes communication through other add-ons or third party software (Ex. Skype/Discord).

They were shot at randomly, and did not report it, so no action was taken.

Maybe it could be they didn't report it because they wanted to handle it within an in-character resolution...

And this is an example of why you shouldn't do that. If you don't have any idea besides "some guy in that direction," maybe you should report it to the people who have logs to find out who that guy is?

Kinda hard to ask questions first and shoot later because everything is text only.

Seeing as you're completely free to demand literally everything someone owns first and THEN murder the stuff out of them for not complying with your demands, I'm not sure this is exactly a quality server anyway.

And this is an example of why you shouldn't do that. If you don't have any idea besides "some guy in that direction," maybe you should report it to the people who have logs to find out who that guy is?

Okay yeah, this roleplay sounds awful if you're more in favor of policing the roleplay this heavily without letting simple things be handled within character conflict. He already gave a reason why he downed somebody, it was because he was already attacked. Since the provoker was attacking for seemingly no reason, there's reason to believe he would attack again for no reason given the chance again if they stopped to question him. It makes sense why they did it and in no way is it a RDM because it wasn't random.

there's reason to believe he wouldn't attack again for no reason

Whoops, noedit

Okay since I keep loving up the sentence let me reiterate more concisely: He was searching for somebody who randomly attacked him. He had justifiable reason to believe that the person who randomly attacked him would randomly attack him again if confronted, so he didn't give the suspicious party a chance to attack him before questioning him.

If you can't see why this is reasonable, you shouldn't be admin.

RDM stands for Random Death Match, it refers to hurting or killing without reason. They had a reason so is not RDM, ergo is not banable, so you should unban them