| Off Topic > Off Topic |
| [NEWS] President Annoying Orange's travel ban still halted by federal court |
| << < (13/27) > >> |
| Corderlain:
--- Quote from: Nonnel on February 10, 2017, 02:13:16 PM ---and the immigration act of 65 amended the act of 52 and revoked this ability --- End quote --- Show me where. |
| otto-san:
--- Quote from: Corderlain on February 10, 2017, 02:09:34 PM ---The 9th circuit made a political decision not a judicial decision. They're supposed to uphold the law not bend it to fit their political agenda. Circuit should be redone and the judges should be removed from bench. --- End quote --- --- Quote from: Corderlain on February 10, 2017, 02:11:41 PM ---Immigration act of 52 allows for the president at any time to close borders on immigrants and any others when he feels the safety of the American people is threatened. --- End quote --- they haven't made any decisions yet about the legality of the ban. all they've done is put it on hold until courts either affirm its legality or deem it illegal. and if the SCOTUS determines that it is illegal, or defers to a lower court's decision, then that will be the new legal precedent on the matter. |
| Corderlain:
--- Quote from: otto-san on February 10, 2017, 02:15:11 PM ---they haven't made any decisions yet about the legality of the ban. all they've done is put it on hold until courts either affirm its legality or deem it illegal. --- End quote --- It's entirely legal. The amendment of 65 says nothing about the presidents ability to close borders due to national security concerns. This is the hyper liberal west coast judicial circuit making a play based on political agenda. They've done this before and they will continue to do it. Need to be removed from bench. |
| otto-san:
removing judges from their positions and overhauling the federal judiciary as punishment for an unfavorable ruling sounds like a hilariously terrible thing to become standard practice that being said, no ruling has even been made yet. it seems completely reasonable to temporarily suspend an order until its legality is determined |
| Corderlain:
--- Quote from: otto-san on February 10, 2017, 02:18:18 PM ---removing judges from their positions and overhauling the federal judiciary as punishment for an unfavorable ruling sounds like a hilariously terrible thing to become standard practice that being said, no ruling has even been made yet --- End quote --- A ruling has been made by the 9th circuit that the ban won't be upheld. This is being taken further and will most likely reach the Supreme Court where it will be passed. The 9th circuit has a history of making judgements based on their political agenda. I agree that a rework of the judicial system would be ineffective therefore the judges need to be replaced with those who don't bring political basis to the bench which is supposed to be above that and adherent strictly to the law. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |