| Off Topic > Off Topic |
| [NEWS] Annoying Orange proposes $54 bil increase on military spending |
| << < (23/31) > >> |
| PhantOS:
--- Quote from: Red Spy on February 28, 2017, 06:45:43 PM ---We'd go to war if they were invaded --- End quote --- you know 'we'd' is short for 'we would' as in, we would do that if it happened. which it hasn't |
| Ipquarx:
again, considering Donald has been big on the whole "No wars" thing, and being against defending NATO allies from aggression, why do we need an increase in spending when we're already spending too much |
| PhantOS:
--- Quote from: Ipquarx on February 28, 2017, 06:49:22 PM ---again, considering Donald has been big on the whole "No wars" thing, and being against defending NATO allies from aggression, why do we need an increase in spending when we're already spending too much --- End quote --- the us isn't even spending that much on NATO or the UN. we pay less than 10 billion of the 600 billion military budget on UN and NATO |
| otto-san:
--- Quote from: PhantOS on February 28, 2017, 06:46:27 PM ---you know 'we'd' is short for 'we would' as in, we would do that if it happened. which it hasn't --- End quote --- well, to be fair, part of the reason it hasn't happened could be because the world's strongest military is ready to lay down the forget if anyone tries anything |
| Planr:
--- Quote from: McZealot on February 28, 2017, 06:44:51 PM ---the US doesn't control NATO or the OAS wtf. do you even know what you are talking about. --- End quote --- no one ever said the US controlled them. he said the US defends them. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |