he will not divide us is now in liverpool [update] the flag is down

[King Tøny]

Self defense

Martin Luther king preached peace, not violence. Don't give me this bullstuff.

[Ad Bot]

[PhantOS]

Martin Luther king preached peace, not violence. Don't give me this bullstuff.

Martin Luther King was around in 1960, not the 1800s. Segregation and Slavery are two completely different things. One is a political disenfranchisement and the other is loving slavery.

[Insert Name Here²]

Martin Luther King was around in 1960, not the 1800s

fake news

[King Tøny]

You're basically saying violence is okay if the system is against you.

MLK would be rolling in his loving grave. He campaigned for his rights without violence.

[PhantOS]

You're basically saying violence is okay if the system is against you.

MLK would be rolling in his loving grave. He campaigned for his rights without violence. Even in "self defense"

Violence is okay if your basic human loving rights are being threatened. I would justify fighting against slavery just as i would justify rioting in a national socialist death camp to escape.

During the 60s the time was very different, they used to hose people down just for walking around.

[King Tøny]

Martin Luther King was around in 1960, not the 1800s. Segregation and Slavery are two completely different things. One is a political disenfranchisement and the other is loving slavery.

PhantOS was strawmanning my argument, i called him out on that too.

[PhantOS]

So what's your solution? If you and your family are involuntarily enslaved and forced to work without pay, should you sit back and let it happen?

It's literally the 2nd loving amendment. If someone breaks into your house and starts shooting at your family, should you practice the nonviolence that MLK preaches? Will that save your children from being shot?

[King Tøny]

Violence is okay if your basic human loving rights are being threatened. I would justify fighting against slavery just as i would justify rioting in a national socialist death camp to escape.

During the 60s the time was very different, they used to hose people down just for walking around.

That's still a violation of rights, so you support getting violent in the 60s because it invades your rights.

Meanwhile MLK fought for your rights without violence.  

[PhantOS]

That's still a violation of rights, so you support getting violent in the 60s because it invades your rights.

Meanwhile MLK fought for your rights without violence.  

Enslaving people and treating them unfairly is a violation of rights. Taking up arms in that exact situation is not.

In case you were wondering, i also follow Malcolm X's preaching as well as MLK.

[King Tøny]

So what's your solution? If you and your family are involuntarily enslaved and forced to work without pay, should you sit back and let it happen?

Okay so hear me out.


It's either work as a slave in America.

OR!

Get shipped back to my home country Africa to then become a slave there.

OR!

Death

[PhantOS]

Okay so hear me out.


It's either work as a slave in America.

OR!

Get shipped back to my home country Africa to then become a slave there.

OR!

Death

I think the argument ends here you loving psycho

[King Tøny]

Slavery still exists in Africa in the year 2017 by the way but you don't seem to push your half white guilt bullstuff on that issue.

[PhantOS]

Slavery still exists in Africa in the year 2017 by the way but you don't seem to push your half white guilt bullstuff on that issue.

What half white guilt? I don't promote white guilt either

[PhantOS]

You literally believe that black people should either accept being enslaved for 200 years or move to a different country. I have nothing left to say to you.

[King Tøny]

I think the argument ends here you loving psycho

Those were the options back then and it's very rare people became free.

Don't blame us white folk.

Your own race sold yourselves out for common beads and trinkets.