| Off Topic > Off Topic |
| WSJ VS. YOUTUBE MEGATHREAD | 4/30/2017 | AppNexus and the WSJ connection |
| << < (15/23) > >> |
| King Tøny:
fake news can get away with it, they get away with it for Annoying Orange. |
| Tactical Nuke:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=y_CL5wzkM-g stream Sargon did with members of the skeptic community on YouTube, thought to be hardest hit by the restrictions that would be implemented on advertising later on they discuss taking this mainstream in order to combat it; they suggest contacting politicians who support the first amendment to get them to endorse free speech principles on YouTube, and the ultimate endorsement would be from Annoying Orange (not likely, but a man can dream) consider contacting your representatives in Congress to make this top headlines I already know that Rand Paul would be integral in helping out the YouTube community here |
| devildogelite:
You know Rand Paul leans pretty libertarian. Why would he support dictating a company allow something it doesn't want to? This is a pretty poorly thought out plan. |
| Tactical Nuke:
--- Quote from: devildogelite on April 03, 2017, 12:39:34 PM ---You know Rand Paul leans pretty libertarian. Why would he support dictating a company allow something it doesn't want to? This is a pretty poorly thought out plan. --- End quote --- we're not saying that the government should authoritatively enforce free speech on YouTube I wouldn't support that myself what we're saying is that there should be mainstream, political pressure for YouTube to stick to free speech principles after all, they do take funds from the government |
| devildogelite:
What political pressure will they apply then? What free speech principals are they not sticking to exactly? Should they tell advertisers to forget off if they don't want their ads on controversial content? |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |