Author Topic: At Least 70 Syrians Killed In a Suspected Gas Attack (ongoing story)  (Read 8482 times)

No one is saying Assad is a nice guy, but the rebels here are CIA and al qaeda. Why would Assad order a gas attack after the Obama admin said there were no chemical weapons there in 13 and when he's about to receive help from Russia and or Annoying Orange. Looks like a false flag to me.
The rebels and CIA are two completely different groups that constantly war with each other. The rebels are mostly remnants of the FSA and parts of the pro-regime forces that defected due to the events of the arab spring. Occasionally, those soldiers will defect to CIA, but they aren't at all affiliated or allied.

The syrian civil war began in 2012, there's a high chance that some new weapons have been introduced in the 4 years between the start of the war and now. All context and prior knowledge of the start of the civil war shows that the regime has no problem killing civilians as part of collateral damage, and actively uses censorship and murder as tools to suppress peaceful protests. With that key knowledge in mind, it's more than likely that Assad and his regime would pull something like this, but it's still being investigated.

The victims report they saw planes and chemical weapons being dropped from the sky, so if they find any evidence of debris of chemical weapons, we'll know who dropped them. The only actors operating in syrian airspace are US, Russian, Turkish and Syrian forces.
« Last Edit: April 06, 2017, 12:20:54 PM by PhantOS »

They legit just pushed the rebels out of Aleppo. Why oh why would Assad gas then when the world is staring right at it? He's a bad guy, not an idiot.


« Last Edit: April 06, 2017, 12:23:02 PM by Corderlain »

They legit just pushed the rebels out of Aleppo. Why oh why would Assad gas then when the world is staring right at it? He's a bad guy, not an idiot.
It's a good question. Right now we wait to find out, but given all the field information, such as the weapon used, the alleged mode of delivery, it was probably an airstrike of some sort.

4chan conspiracy take with cup of salt. Still, events lining up like this make me skeptical...

If planes were used in the attack, then CIA or rebel forces are probably not the cause of the attack. Also chemical scientists have confirmed that destroying a cache of sarin wouldn't weaponize the gas, so the chances of it being collateral damage are almost non-existant

Unless it was stored improperly and was already weaponized. Also, considering some of the supplies that these rebels are showing up with I would be surprised if they have some stuffty bomber from the 70s in the air. Pure speculation.

Last I checked, FSA, CIA, Kurdish Forces and the other factions in that area don't have an air force. The chances of them stumbling across a bomber, finding a perfectly intact airstrip to launch and land the aircraft on, and not getting hit by any regime surface to air missiles is absurdly low

The sarin could've probably already been weaponized, but even then it raises the question of why there was an airstrike at that exact time, especially since it's in a location heavy with civilians

About as likely as Assad purposefully gassing people imo.

Well Assad purposefully airstrikes people, the only difference between the two is the weapon being used. We'll have to wait and see

A hospital was also targeted and destroyed around the same time, which is really suspect. The chances of a sarin gas storage cache next to a hospital?
« Last Edit: April 06, 2017, 12:35:15 PM by PhantOS »

No one is saying Assad is a nice guy, but the rebels here are CIA and al qaeda
That's not accurate at all - like factually speaking. CIA and Al-Qaeda are technically part of 'the rebels', but when you hear people refer to the Syrian rebels on television, they're talking about the Syrian Opposition, which collectively represents thousands of rebel groups and alternative governments that seek to replace Assad's regime. CIA and Al-Qaeda are generally considered a separate category from the Syrian Opposition.

That's not accurate at all - like factually speaking. CIA and Al-Qaeda are technically part of 'the rebels', but when you hear people refer to the Syrian rebels on television, they're talking about the Syrian Opposition, which collectively represents thousands of rebel groups and alternative governments that seek to replace Assad's regime. CIA and Al-Qaeda are generally considered a separate category from the Syrian Opposition.

Thanks for being our eyes on the ground.

Thanks for being our eyes on the ground.
amazing response

Thanks for being our eyes on the ground.
Yep, you caught me. I'm secretly a jihadi.

(and there goes my ability to board planes for the rest of my life)

All he does is regurgitate Cnn and WaPo articles. If I wanted someone to coach interviewees I would go back and rewatch the CNN coverage of the election.

All he does is regurgitate Cnn and WaPo articles. If I wanted someone to coach interviewees I would go back and rewatch the CNN coverage of the election.
The information he 'regurgitated' is also from the UN, Turkey, The regime itself and several other intelligence reports from the area. If you refuse to believe actual facts then there's no sense arguing at all.