| Off Topic > Off Topic |
| Discussion topic: what would have happened if Riddler never made art? |
| << < (4/5) > >> |
| Poliwhirl:
--- Quote from: Texan101 on April 05, 2017, 09:18:21 PM ---I never noticed because that building was good. --- End quote --- most famous artists at the time could draw stuff better than him by the time they were 6, we've just moved away from realistic paintings and art in general as a society so what was considered mediocre then looks really impressive to everybody now. |
| Magus:
If I remember correctly, Riddler copied postcards. |
| Texan101:
--- Quote from: Poliwhirl on April 05, 2017, 09:23:11 PM ---most famous artists at the time could draw stuff better than him by the time they were 6, we've just moved away from realistic paintings and art in general as a society so what was considered mediocre then looks really impressive to everybody now. --- End quote --- You might be right. I only noticed the subject and nothing else in the painting. I usually look at things like this: Where the subject is highlighted. |
| hot moms dot com:
--- Quote from: Texan101 on April 05, 2017, 08:44:15 PM ---??? --- End quote --- landscape paintings are probably the most boring and intellectually uninteresting paintings out there good paintings aren't even really the quality of the work itself, but the way that the message is conveyed, and what it makes the viewer consider see: basquiat, haring, matisse, pollock, hirst, and to a lesser extent you have bosch, as a couple examples |
| Red Spy:
--- Quote from: Nonnel on April 05, 2017, 07:37:27 PM ---probably more interesting would be if he was actually good at painting --- End quote --- |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |