| Off Topic > Off Topic |
| Snopes is no longer a credible source of information. |
| << < (4/6) > >> |
| Bisjac:
--- Quote from: Nonnel on April 23, 2017, 06:05:54 PM ---even if this were true, if your standard for credibility is never making a mistake, then there is no credible source --- End quote --- wikileaks 100% track record i like "news" that just shows you proven data and dosnt tell a story at all. |
| Master Matthew²:
--- Quote from: Bisjac on April 23, 2017, 06:31:12 PM ---wikileaks 100% track record i like "news" that just shows you proven data and dosnt tell a story at all. --- End quote --- But that's not what sells buddy, that's not what sells! |
| Ipquarx:
--- Quote from: Bisjac on April 23, 2017, 06:31:12 PM ---wikileaks 100% track record i like "news" that just shows you proven data and dosnt tell a story at all. --- End quote --- As much as everyone would like it to be true, wikileaks is not 100% reliable. They pushed hard on the whole "Clinton was wearing an earpiece during debates" conspiracy theory that was debunked. This is not saying snopes is perfect either... No website/group is 100% reliable. Ever. |
| Nonnel:
--- Quote from: Bisjac on April 23, 2017, 06:31:12 PM ---i like "news" that just shows you proven data and dosnt tell a story at all. --- End quote --- like the article in question? it straight up just says what is/is not true |
| Bisjac:
--- Quote from: Ipquarx on April 23, 2017, 07:15:02 PM ---They pushed hard on... --- End quote --- where is the debunk? another source of a source of a source that some 3rd rate left conspiracy site told you about? citation needed. and that should be very easy if it exists. wikileaks posted real proven emails that showed hillary planning to cheat. they didnt decide if ear pieces were used or not. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |