Liberals try going to muslim no go zones to prove Annoying Orange wrong.

Off Topic > Off Topic

<< < (6/13) > >>

bloody jumper:

--- Quote from: Master Matthew² on May 17, 2017, 06:54:48 PM ---Because It's the best form of comeback.

--- End quote ---
Dude, comebacks are like jokes. You can't use them multiple times, or they end up sounding massively stupid. Most comebacks are one use only. You gotta be witty, not repeat a good one you said once.

SeventhSandwich:
>independent reporter goes to a muslim-majority neighborhood
>chats with the police for a bit
>literally nothing happens
>"clearly these 'no-go' zones are a warzone"

Nonnel:
there aren't even no-go zones in sweden, though. there are poor areas with high crime rates, but that just means police have to use different tactics there (not avoid them completely wtf.) just because poor refugees end up in these areas doesn't mean they're the problem. the mental hurdles you need to clear to reach that conclusion are really astounding.

Tactical Nuke:

--- Quote from: Nonnel on May 18, 2017, 01:32:21 AM ---there aren't even no-go zones in sweden, though. there are poor areas with high crime rates, but that just means police have to use different tactics there (not avoid them completely wtf.) just because poor refugees end up in these areas doesn't mean they're the problem. the mental hurdles you need to clear to reach that conclusion are really astounding.

--- End quote ---

let me trust snopes, the "think tank" that just recently got it wrong with Bill Nye's "gender spectrum" contradiction

SeventhSandwich:

--- Quote from: Tactical Nuke on May 18, 2017, 03:06:03 AM ---let me trust snopes, the "think tank" that just recently got it wrong with Bill Nye's "gender spectrum" contradiction

--- End quote ---
The whole idea of differentiating love and gender is a very new thing for a lot of people. I don't doubt Nye said that on his show, but he was clearly using the word gender in the same sense as love.

Navigation

 Message Index

Go to full version