| Off Topic > Off Topic |
| 300 US Marines vs 60000 Romans |
| << < (5/17) > >> |
| Red Spy:
--- Quote from: Shift Kitty on May 20, 2017, 01:33:14 PM ----the shields do nothing. --- End quote --- Hate to break it to you but bullets go through wood |
| Shift Kitty:
--- Quote from: Red Spy on May 20, 2017, 02:18:53 PM ---Hate to break it to you but bullets go through wood --- End quote --- A few people have said this by now, yes. |
| PhantOS:
according to Sun Tzu size comes in numbers, not weaponery 300 marines even with machine guns wouldn't be enough to take down 60,000 romans. first, they'd be way too intimidated by the sheer size of the roman army, which would obviously cause panic and morale to deteriorate instantly. second, the amount of bullets required to sustain 300 marines continuously firing on that many romans would cost millions of dollars and isn't even realistic in a military sense. Most assault rifles would only be effective at around 100 meters and by that time, the romans can easily charge and close that distance enough to charge the marines. Once the romans are within 20 meters then the marines are essentially defenseless anyways and would probably run 300 marines can probably hold their ground against an army 3x their size if they were stationery, but if you gave them horses for example, they'd probably be able to fight against an army 20x their size |
| Dreams_Of_Cheese:
--- Quote from: PhantOS on May 20, 2017, 02:20:26 PM ---Most assault rifles would only be effective at around 100 meters and by that time --- End quote --- scuse me |
| ShadowsfeaR:
>5.56 >carbine length rifle >"only effective at 100 meters" Kek Tho in the video it's WW2 soldiers with .45 ACP Thompsons. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |