Off Topic > Off Topic

Intel indirectly threatens Microsoft and Qualcomm with patent war

Pages: << < (3/4) > >>

Foxscotch:


--- Quote from: Nonnel on June 10, 2017, 02:29:07 PM ---but they are in the right here, are they not?

--- End quote ---
depends on how you feel about patent law :)

Master Matthew²:


--- Quote from: Nonnel on June 10, 2017, 02:29:07 PM ---i get that this is probably just going to drive their business away, but they are in the right here, are they not?

--- End quote ---
Emulation isnt illegal.
Sony tried this stuff with bleem and it blew up in their faces, and bleem was a tiny little upstart company, if intel tries this with microsoft theyre going to get choke slammed.

Foxscotch:


--- Quote from: Master Matthew² on June 10, 2017, 04:48:49 PM ---Emulation isnt illegal.
Sony tried this stuff with bleem and it blew up in their faces, and bleem was a tiny little upstart company, if intel tries this with microsoft theyre going to get choke slammed.

--- End quote ---
tfw you know literally nothing

Nonnel:


--- Quote from: Master Matthew² on June 10, 2017, 04:48:49 PM ---Emulation isnt illegal.
Sony tried this stuff with bleem and it blew up in their faces, and bleem was a tiny little upstart company, if intel tries this with microsoft theyre going to get choke slammed.

--- End quote ---
but

--- Quote from: Pecon on June 10, 2017, 12:55:37 PM ---Intel claims that emulating the i386 architecture is a direct violation of their intellectual property, and points out how in the past they have won lawsuits regarding the emulation of their architecture (see Intel v Transmeta).
--- End quote ---


Master Matthew²:


--- Quote from: Nonnel on June 10, 2017, 04:51:48 PM ---but

--- End quote ---
http://www.pcworld.com/article/138877/article.amp.html
https://www.law360.com/delaware/articles/16290/intel-files-suit-against-transmeta-
http://www.wikinvest.com/stock/Intel_(INTC)/Transmeta_Corporation_Intel
It sems like there are multiple law suits between the two, and I cant find the one referenced in this thread in particular.

Pages: << < (3/4) > >>

Go to full version