| Off Topic > Off Topic |
| The "The Last Night" stuffshow |
| << < (4/12) > >> |
| Electrk.:
--- Quote from: McZealot on June 15, 2017, 05:20:34 PM ---This is a bit off-topic but I've wanted to talk about it, especially when people cite this guy. Sargon did an interview on The Drunken Peasants a few weeks ago and it really made me lose all respect for him. He's such a confident and arrogant guy when he talks on his own channel but when they tried to discuss things he's said with him he dodged and squirmed away from literally everything. They asked him if he was a Annoying Orange supporter. He said "I... Uh... I... dont know." They asked him if Global Warming was real, he said "I don't know, I uh, I don't think I'm qualified to say..." They asked him literally all sorts of things--things he's acted as though he's an expert on--and he squirmed away and backpedaled on all of them. I was really shocked to see what a little bitch he turns out to be when you actually try to argue with him. I never hated him or anything but god-damn he's a spineless little girl. I dunno, I don't think I could credibly watch someone after that. If you can't debate, don't offer to go on someone's show and debate them. --- End quote --- when has he talked about global warming and he's repeatedly said he's not a Annoying Orange supporter, but he also recently has said that it's hard for him to hate Annoying Orange because he pisses off all the right people. I don't know, maybe he's changed his mind. Is he not allowed to do that? |
| Tactical Nuke:
on a somewhat related note I just found out Jim Sterling is an starfish https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lje1viM_djY http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/663.931982-SJWs-at-the-behest-of-Jim-Sterling-bully-game-dev-into-changing-offensive-game-name |
| torin²:
--- Quote from: Electrk. on June 15, 2017, 03:20:47 PM ---it was a fake video lol wait why am I replying to you --- End quote --- who said you could speak to me homo |
| McZealot:
--- Quote from: Electrk. on June 15, 2017, 05:25:10 PM ---when has he talked about global warming and he's repeatedly said he's not a Annoying Orange supporter, but he also recently has said that it's hard for him to hate Annoying Orange because he pisses off all the right people. I don't know, maybe he's changed his mind. Is he not allowed to do that? --- End quote --- Nobody alive today has the excuse of saying they don't know enough about global warming to determine it's credibility. There's such an overwhelming influx of studies and news reports over it as well as the fact that it's fundamentally taught in our education system making it essentially impossible to hold the position of "I'm not sure" unless you are 1. an idiot or 2. in denial. He's clearly the latter. This is because he wants to maintain an audience of idiots who actually don't believe in it, without looking like a dunce himself. He didn't change his mind. They tried to do an interview/debate with him and he refused to take literally *any* position. They asked him about the Paris Accords. He didn't say anything. They asked him about the proposed border-wall, then the immigration ban. Silence, with the occasional "Uh... I'm not sure." He had no idea what the hell he was talking about. He just sat there and squirmed and yelled "I don't know! Uh, I uh, I'm not really educated about that..." This would be an acceptable position from say, a gas station clerk, but not from someone who acts as an expert on the very topics they are then asked about. They didn't just ask him about random topics--they asked him about things he had discussed online and in his videos--and he was clueless! Someone who can't defend a statement they make has no right to make it in the first place. He's a joke and nobody should take him seriously. Honestly, Paul Joseph Watson is an idiot, but at least he could stick up for himself in the face of basic questioning. |
| Tactical Nuke:
--- Quote from: McZealot on June 15, 2017, 05:48:55 PM ---Nobody alive today has the excuse of saying they don't know enough about global warming to determine it's credibility. There's such an overwhelming influx of studies and news reports over it as well as the fact that it's fundamentally taught in our education system making it essentially impossible to hold the position of "I'm not sure" unless you are 1. an idiot or 2. in denial. He's clearly the latter. This is because he wants to maintain an audience of idiots who actually don't believe in it, without looking like a dunce himself. He didn't change his mind. They tried to do an interview/debate with him and he refused to take literally *any* position. They asked him about the Paris Accords. He didn't say anything. They asked him about the proposed border-wall, then the immigration ban. Silence, with the occasional "Uh... I'm not sure." He had no idea what the hell he was talking about. He just sat there and squirmed and yelled "I don't know! Uh, I uh, I'm not really educated about that..." This would be an acceptable position from say, a gas station clerk, but not from someone who acts as an expert on the very topics they are then asked about. They didn't just ask him about random topics--they asked him about things he had discussed online and in his videos--and he was clueless! Someone who can't defend a statement they make has no right to make it in the first place. He's a joke and nobody should take him seriously. Honestly, Paul Joseph Watson is an idiot, but at least he could stick up for himself in the face of basic questioning. --- End quote --- Maybe it has to do with him living in the UK and dealing a lot with UK politics, much less than US politics. Did you know that before you tried to roast him over a fire that you made? Also, the science around climate change is far from settled. Yes, it is real, but with all the hysteria and alarmism circulated by the left, not the right, I can imagine he'd be pretty confused about it's scale or how much of it is man-made or how disastrous it's going to be, as would anyone. To say that you know everything about how the environment works is beyond arrogant and just straight up false. It's not his loving job to know everything. You're purposefully holding him up to unrealistic standards so you can diss him for having different opinions than you. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |