Off Topic > Off Topic

[NEWS] nasa eyes urstar fish for missions in 2030s

Pages: << < (4/12) > >>

Drydess:


--- Quote from: Master Matthew² on June 18, 2017, 11:41:36 AM ---You misunderstand, urstar fish consumes all, and besides, by the time it means anything, we'll all be dead.


--- End quote ---
maybe urstar fish you fat forget but not mine

thegoodperry:


--- Quote from: Drydess on June 18, 2017, 11:33:04 AM --- a waste of money that's going to give us billions in gaseous resources to mine for (hopefully) hundreds of years, along with boosting technological advancements
it's a bit of a trek to get there but it's worth it definitely in the long run

--- End quote ---
the methane we harvest from urstar fish could be used for kitchen stoves and that's it. It's nowhere near complex enough to make a fuel that cars can run on

Master Matthew²:


--- Quote from: Drydess on June 18, 2017, 11:42:31 AM --- maybe urstar fish you fat forget but not mine

--- End quote ---
#NotMystar fish
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Magus:

Let's go to Titan instead.
It has literal oceans of oil.

SeventhSandwich:

How about we just let NASA direct their own scientific inquiries and not worry about the economic return of an agency which creates hundreds of billions of dollars in spin-off technologies and research?

Pages: << < (4/12) > >>

Go to full version