I feel like 'virtue signalling' is a new excuse for crybabies to complain about content with a different opinion than them. Funny cause this is the party that hates Tumblr for doing the same thing
Virtue signalling has been around since moral busybodies. The evangelist moral busybodies did it when it came to gay marriage and other things they found morally objectionable. Kim Davis is a fine example of this. "LOOK AT HOW VIRTUOUS I AM BY REFUSING THIS GAY COUPLE'S RIGHT TO MARRY. LOOK AT ME MY FELLOW DEVOUT CHRISTIANS". Then other virtue signallers rally under her and go "YES WE SEE YOU WE ARE ALSO VIRTUOUS!!!!" It is no different than this video and others like it where people basically circlejerk under their misguided notions of moral superiority.
It's especially annoying in cases like this because we don't need to be reminded refugees are human beings. Literally no one is arguing that they're not human beings. People who make videos like this seem to think showing us some sympathetic stories from refugees and illegals is gonna change people's minds. As if we don't already know there's people out there like that. It's basically just an attempt to guilt trip people into falling in line. It's a bunch of bullstuff.
And anyway, ADIDAS owns sweatshops in these thirdworld countries. They're the last loving company that gets to virtue signal. In fact, that's another reason why virtue signalling is such bullstuff. It's loving hypocritical. These people who virtue signal do it to cover their own asses. They know damn well they have no right to try to police the morals of other people when they're doing some forgeted up stuff, but because the left is currently easily swayed through virtue signalling, getting brownie points for being diverse, inclusive, or whatever is easy as forget. It is BUUUUUUUUUUUULLstuff
