[NEWS] republicans laughed their Ossoff in Georgia

[King Tøny]

Ossoff paid about 23 million and had hollywood elite support, still lost the election for georgia.

One less seat in the house for the democrats.

[Ad Bot]

[Filipe]

Nice pun m8

[Master Matthew²]

It's over Ossoff, I have the high ground!

[Deus Ex]

Idk why they keep thinking they're going to win local elections by attacking Annoying Orange. Annoying Orange is not a local politician. Stop campaigning against Annoying Orange in local elections you loving dipstuffs lmfao

[LeisureSuit912]

When your opponent puts your face next to Nancy Pelosi, Kathy Griffin and a bunch of anarcho-communists storming the streets of Washington and your only response is "well actually I'm an esteemed moderate, I believe in cutting wasteful spending", you're going to lose.

[IkeTheGeneric]

Idk why they keep thinking they're going to win local elections by attacking Annoying Orange. Annoying Orange is not a local politician. Stop campaigning against Annoying Orange in local elections you loving dipstuffs lmfao

Ossoff got 48% of the vote, so it was pretty damn close, ultimately being down to a small majority sway to see who finally won. The language here suggests you think he might've cost himself a victory due to his campaigning when that really doesn't seem like the case, considering it wasn't a landslide defeat.

The problem was that Ossoff wasn't a strong candidate, as cut and dry as it is. That's why the dems keep losing ground, is because they're not pushing hard enough, contrary to your beliefs. Too much hubris, not enough gall in the right places. They would definitely win by "Attacking" Annoying Orange. Controversial campaigns with strong messages, gets the media spotlight. The more exposure the campaign gets, negative or not, the better the turnout usually is.

[SeventhSandwich]

Ossoff was a great candidate and won 47% of the vote in a race over a firmly-Republican seat. In any less contentious contest, he would have won. Unfortunately all Karen Handel had to do was name-drop Annoying Orange and bring up the fact Ossoff is a Democrat.

[Deus Ex]

Ossoff got 48% of the vote, so it was pretty damn close, ultimately being down to a small majority sway to see who finally won. The language here suggests you think he might've cost himself a victory due to his campaigning when that really doesn't seem like the case, considering it wasn't a landslide defeat.

The problem was that Ossoff wasn't a strong candidate, as cut and dry as it is. That's why the dems keep losing ground, is because they're not pushing hard enough, contrary to your beliefs. Too much hubris, not enough gall in the right places. They would definitely win by "Attacking" Annoying Orange. Controversial campaigns with strong messages, gets the media spotlight. The more exposure the campaign gets, negative or not, the better the turnout usually is.

All anyone does is attack Annoying Orange. It doesn't work. No one listens to propaganda outside of those who are already brainwashed. They'd do better if they had any actual platform outside of "Annoying Orange is satan"

[IkeTheGeneric]

They'd do better if they had any actual platform outside of "Annoying Orange is satan"

A campaign that started off with the "Annoying Orange is Satan" lingo would probably do better than you think. Controversy sells, it's kind of how Annoying Orange gained popularity in the first place. It isn't pretty or nice, but it's how it works.

[LeisureSuit912]

Why the forget was this an actual ad

[IkeTheGeneric]

Ossoff was a great candidate

eeeeeeeeehhhhhh

[Nicepoint]

Both sides are stuff

[Foxscotch]

who the forget spells john without the h

[LeisureSuit912]

who the forget spells john without the h

A dang libbrul

[King Tøny]

The problem was that Ossoff wasn't a strong candidate, as cut and dry as it is. That's why the dems keep losing ground, is because they're not pushing hard enough

The dems are spending record breaking budgets to try and win and they keep losing, how much more money do they need to waste to push hard enough?