Off Topic > Off Topic
a Punished Toxicology appreciate thread
Kidalex90:
--- Quote from: McJob on November 26, 2017, 02:31:03 AM ---What.
Did you even read what I said? I explained exactly why my posts aren't flaming.
--- End quote ---
you said you flame people in a "non bannable way"
IkeTheGeneric:
My understanding is that the bounds of the rule is a threshold of being an starfish towards someone unwarranted. Calling someone a stupid starfish (or what have you) in an argument isn't bannable, but copying somebody's movie thread to mock them unprovoked is.
"Flaming" is just unwarranted personal attacks anyways. Being a richard or insulting people isn't flaming on it's own.
Verification:
there's a difference between flaming, bashing, and snide remarks. mcjob is somewhere in the middle of bashing and snide remarks i would think. he actually constructs a feasible argument and still bothers to actually talk to you most of the time.
Mardalf:
--- Quote from: Maxwell. on November 26, 2017, 02:32:29 AM ---jesus what is it about the flaming rule you people don't get
--- End quote ---
Don't set big stuff on fire right?
Like only make small manageable fires
Or is it more the intention of the fire like when they burn an old house because it's easier than tearing it down?
Kidalex90:
--- Quote from: IkeTheGeneric on November 26, 2017, 02:33:18 AM ---My understanding is that the bounds of the rule is a threshold of being an starfish towards someone unwarranted. Calling someone a stupid starfish (or what have you) in an argument isn't bannable, but copying somebody's movie thread to mock them unprovoked is.
"Flaming" is just unwarranted personal attacks anyways. Being a richard or insulting people isn't flaming on it's own.
--- End quote ---
then by your logic toxicologys ban is complete bullstuff
you are not the brightest person