| Off Topic > Off Topic |
| a Punished Toxicology appreciate thread |
| << < (39/51) > >> |
| Kidalex90:
--- Quote from: IkeTheGeneric on November 26, 2017, 02:58:57 AM ---You're acting as if I'm the one who banned toxicology --- End quote --- what the god damn --- Quote from: IkeTheGeneric on November 26, 2017, 02:51:24 AM ---This is a good example of flaming --- End quote --- also that was provoked by your logic i shouldnt be banned --- Quote from: McJob on November 26, 2017, 02:41:58 AM ---Kidalex90, you put a bunch of screenshots in your signature to demonstrate your "bad boy status", showing bans and people getting upset with you. Do you really believe you have any ground to stand on when discussing who is or isn't ban-worthy, when you can't even seem to understand the rules for yourself? --- End quote --- also this is unprovoked by your logic he should be banned |
| McJob:
--- Quote from: Kidalex90 on November 26, 2017, 03:00:39 AM ---also this is unprovoked --- End quote --- I am trying to demonstrate why you don't have a platform to stand on when discussing who should be banned, given the fact that you have a reputation for acting outside of the rules and giving two fingers to authority. It is perfectly within context of this thread, where you're trying to assert reasons I should be banned. |
| IkeTheGeneric:
This is what's known as 'rules lawyering' The context and precedence is there, I'm just trying to interpret it for you. You really can't twist it to argue to me about how people should have / shouldn't have been banned since it seems toxicology is currently banned, and mcjob isn't. If you think my interpretation is wrong, then sure. But you're trying to question my logic after asking me to explain it to you since you didn't understand, so I'm wondering what your deal is here. |
| Juncoph:
tfw you try to argue innocence when the judge has already given his verdict |
| Maxwell.:
--- Quote from: Kidalex90 on November 26, 2017, 02:56:14 AM ---except it was provoked because mcjob ip banned toxicology, and thus, dreams of cheese also shouldnt that mean mcjob should be banned because of this post --- End quote --- 1) that was me, who had the go ahead from mcjob to do it anyway because we knew he was gonna start stuff and 2) had no idea dreams of cheese would be banned as well, because I forgot they share the same house. don't expect me to keep track of everyones personal details like your little circlejerk does but hey, the same logic applies, and no offence to cheese, but if toxic keeps this up then I'm sure one day an IP ban will end it for both of them on here. not that I even want that to happen because I consider dreams a friend, and have personally vouched for him to be unbanned at one point after a mistake on the forums part, so I don't think he'll be happy at his brother for causing that either the point is mcjob won't be banned through association here either purposefully or accidentally, the same way I didn't mean to ban dreams of cheese via association here because it'd be stupid since he's not the one being a prick and I already apologised to him, I just wanted to watch the movie in peace, but you handicaps had to barge in and try to ruin it. good thing it backfired so hard that you got exactly what was coming to you, and mcjob defended himself, so logically the only flaming is from toxic's side- again, everyone but you knows this so I know for a fact you're just in this half butthurt half ironic state of disarray over the drama you caused, because you're loving useless at handling yourself I figured I should at least clear this up on mcjob and cheese's part, otherwise you're hardly worth the effort to even respond to. you're 13 and already in with the most toxic people on this forum but I honestly don't give two stuffs at this point if you ruin your reputation or whatever in this community |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |