Off Topic > Off Topic
mediafire now blocks you out when using an adblocker
IkeTheGeneric:
--- Quote from: PhantOS on July 15, 2017, 10:28:49 AM ---it's literally the website hiring an ad server to display banners. the website doesn't have much say in what ads are displayed unless they are willing to dish out extra money for targeting
--- End quote ---
Not only is there a larger selection of ad servers to curate from, I'm fairly sure there are many mediums which other developers help find and curate the best ad servers. Mediafire is garbage-tier and probably settled with the stufftiest ad server because their entire development history is a long string of half-measures and incompetence.
Køtt:
--- Quote from: Arekan on July 15, 2017, 10:25:12 AM ---Where are these insults coming from?
--- End quote ---
let's ignore seconds ago you called me useless in the debate and all in all being dismissive because i was trying to get it straight with a numbskulled person in the forums. even though i wasn't insulting, i said you were stuff-flinging, that's not an insult by the way, that's what you're doing. you're telling me i'm useless without even caring to throw your input in.
--- Quote from: Arekan on July 15, 2017, 10:25:12 AM ---all I see in your posts are repeated mentions of Blockland not being associated with ads on the forums or something completely irrelevant after the point was established.
--- End quote ---
this wasn't what happened, and if your posts right now are showing this lazy and dismissive effort to call me out why bother even replying? again, i was getting it straight to an idiot on the forums that implied this black & white thinking.
--- Quote from: Arekan on July 15, 2017, 10:25:12 AM ---Where did this notion that I'm upset at you even come from?
--- End quote ---
because you did this stupid and short thing where you actually dismissed and called me useless and didn't even bother to reply to me? what else would i think?
i don't even agree with phantos on the matter, mediafire is stuff. i wasn't even in this conversation in the beginning
Verification:
Why the hell do you refer to me as an "idiot on the forums"? You can refer to me as my loving name like I refer to you as.
Also, dismissing arguments with the same argument but altered to combat minor flaws that are patched up by earlier posts isn't "telling it straight". It's being a hardass.
Arekan:
--- Quote from: Køtt on July 15, 2017, 10:32:03 AM ---
--- End quote ---
--- Quote from: Arekan on July 15, 2017, 10:20:10 AM ---Køtt is also useless to debate with
--- End quote ---
You were sidetracking the conversation when you could've just as easily taken it to DMs because it was targeted specifically at Verification.
Køtt:
--- Quote from: Verification on July 15, 2017, 10:33:40 AM ---dismissing arguments with the same argument but altered to combat minor flaws that are patched up by earlier posts isn't "telling it straight". It's being a hardass.
--- End quote ---
so you forgot the part where i said "you're carrying an implied statement"? okay
--- Quote from: Arekan on July 15, 2017, 10:33:49 AM ---You were sidetracking the conversation when you could've just as easily taken it to DMs because it was targeted specifically at Verification.
--- End quote ---
sidetracking? what the forget is this stuff? i'm not allowed to argue about something specific here? what's your point in this sentence?