its hard to tell what people believe. all i know is that the only redeeming part in this entire story is the fact that he relies on logic in the argument, whether that 'logic' is used to defend loveism or not
either way logic alone is a horrible decisive factor for anything. logically it is efficient to kill all homeless people, morally it is wrong, and that's why logic can't always be the decisive factor behind laws. of course, it is logically better to pay women less since they are biologically inferior to men, but morally it's wrong