Off Topic > Off Topic

UK trying to force research sites to prove their users are 18

Pages: << < (6/23) > >>

Verification:


--- Quote from: The Murderous Cop on July 17, 2017, 07:30:52 AM ---so was the mediafire thread and yet you brought it up

--- End quote ---
I brought it up because it was similar to what he did in this thread, made up statistics, this time about how there are apparently lots of child research actresses on the deep web.

PhantOS:


--- Quote from: Verification on July 17, 2017, 07:32:13 AM ---I brought it up because it was similar to what he did in this thread

--- End quote ---
your posting history and 10+ drama threads are also similar to what you said here. yet you declare it unrelated on the grounds that "nuh uh!!!"

stop trying to derail the motherloving thread for no reason. you aren't agreeing or disagreeing with anything because you dont have any proof/claim/statistics so why the forget are you trying to start stuff? if you wanted the attention so desperately why didn't you beg your dead parents or some other bullstuff

The Murderous Cop:


--- Quote from: Verification on July 17, 2017, 07:32:13 AM ---I brought it up because it was similar to what he did in this thread, made up statistics, this time about how there are apparently lots of child research actresses on the deep web.

--- End quote ---

i brought up your stuffty attitude and hypocrisy in the drama thread because it's similar to you bringing up drama here for no real loving reason other than to throw gasoline on a fire

someone already said the same thing you started with, but you just parroted the same thing with the unnecessary mediafire addition

PhantOS:


--- Quote from: crazies alt on July 17, 2017, 07:06:38 AM ---how do you know about this

--- End quote ---
there's a whole onion website dedicated to child research actors and their names. either way, it's not relevant as a statistic but more of an example.

if you want to know why people do this, it's because children are vulnerable to ideas. i'm not going to dig through the 100000 abstracts that exist on child psychology because it should be well understood by now. it's the same reason why gambling requires an age limit. same reason why smoking, alcohol, driving, and every other potentially dangerous activity or mindset that people tend to abuse is restricted to smarter, more mature audiences.

the government isn't afraid of teens jerking their meat or fiddling with their clit. they couldn't care less about that. they mainly care about the potential prostitution it may cause, especially when combined with the lack of love education. there's so many issues that arise due to lack of love education, including diseases, unwanted pregnancy, rape, and a whole other slew of problems. if parents want to let their child be exposed to research, they will manually verify it themselves. it's 100x better than them stumbling across researchographic content by themselves

PhantOS:

there's nothing immoral about watching research. however, research is a public health crCIA. research addiction is a big issue for a lot of people. chronic procrastination stunts hormonal growth in your body, leading to lower love drive and failure of certain secondary love characteristics. it promotes misogynous and misandrous behaviors that reflect on interaction with future partners, etc. all of these are behaviors that vulnerable people can adopt. children are notorious for having addictive personalities as their brains are growing and latch on to behaviors. allowing children to experience these bad behaviors is an objectively bad decision

you could argue that it shouldn't be the government's concern what people do in the privacy of their own homes. that same argument could be applied to the government banning cocaine, excessive abuse of children, and tons of other things that can be potentially harmful for families. research isn't as severe as the aforementioned, but it can definitely be considered one in the eyes of the law

if you want me to provide statistics for any of this, forget you and your sister. google why research is bad. it will take you less time to educate yourself than it will take me time to educate you

Pages: << < (6/23) > >>

Go to full version