| Off Topic > Off Topic |
| UK trying to force research sites to prove their users are 18 |
| << < (8/23) > >> |
| PhantOS:
--- Quote from: Ragequit on July 17, 2017, 08:49:41 AM ---jacking off does not forget with your development wtf --- End quote --- yet its scientifically proven that procrastination changes your testosterone/estrogen levels --- Quote from: Ragequit on July 17, 2017, 08:49:41 AM ---the same way violent television, movies, and games promote real life violence? --- End quote --- im not going to argue for or against that claim --- Quote from: Deus Ex on July 17, 2017, 08:39:15 AM ---LOL WHAT THE forget --- End quote --- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_Online_Protection_Act as someone who masturbates daily, arguing against people who have masturbated their entire life is definitely an uphill battle. |
| crazies alt:
I swore to myself I would never jerk off. But eventually I literally couldn't help myself. So now, the only thing that is different about me is that every now and then I get an urge. Nothing else has changed. |
| King Tøny:
Kids remember your palms will get hairy and you'll go blind. God will hate you forever. |
| Deus Ex:
--- Quote from: PhantOS on July 17, 2017, 08:59:17 AM ---im not going to argue for or against that claim --- End quote --- --- Quote from: PhantOS on July 17, 2017, 07:48:31 AM --- it promotes misogynous and misandrous behaviors that reflect on interaction with future partners, etc. all of these are behaviors that vulnerable people can adopt. --- End quote --- Same thing |
| PhantOS:
--- Quote from: Deus Ex on July 17, 2017, 09:01:55 AM ---Same thing --- End quote --- yes, research does promote bad behavior, and so do video games. who they severely affect and who they don't is up for research and debate. in this case personal anecdotes don't work well, so the "ive played video games my entire life and i havent killed anybody" type stuff cant apply research has its pros and cons, as do gambling and alcohol and video games and other potentially addictive behaviors. anything that is addictive to the point where it may interfere with your life should be monitored to some extent at early ages. how it's monitored is the part that is up for debate, and how far the government can interfere with it. the argument should be whether or not the government should be involved, a subjective point of view, not whether or not research is bad for minors, an objective fact backed by research |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |