| Off Topic > Off Topic |
| Pseudo-scientific/pseudo-historic ideas that interest you. |
| << < (24/31) > >> |
| Platypi:
--- Quote from: Alkatjo on September 19, 2017, 05:27:15 AM ---Dude is delusional. --- End quote --- Last time I saw a video by this guy, he was explaining how the moon was fake or something. |
| Platypi:
--- Quote from: otto-san on September 19, 2017, 02:09:59 PM ---there's no evidence to suggest it at all tho, so at this point it may as well be pseudoscience/science fiction. obvs i'd like for it to be true cus it's neat as Hell, but afaik there's nothin --- End quote --- True. But many of the popular models used nowadays to explain quantum phenomena also predict the existence of mutliple universe. By your same standard, gravitational waves as per Einstein's theory of relativity were "pseudoscience/science fiction" until LIGO detected direct evidence of them in September of 2015. Evidence is important. But something isn't necessarily psuedoscientific just because evidence hasn't been found for it yet. Granted, it should be noted that Einstein's theory of relativity successfully explained recorded phenomena were previous theory's failed. So until 2015, gravitation waves were only a conceptual model to explain gravity, not an actual tangible things: much like string theory or multiple universe theories today. |
| Dreams_Of_Cheese:
--- Quote from: Alkatjo on September 19, 2017, 05:27:15 AM ---Dude is delusional. --- End quote --- Nah dude, did you notice the cutesy animation and high pitched voice? He's totally credible. Nobody with animation and sound editing skills can be wrong. |
| otto-san:
--- Quote from: Platypi on September 19, 2017, 06:13:34 PM ---True. But many of the popular models used nowadays to explain quantum phenomena also predict the existence of mutliple universe. By your same standard, gravitational waves as per Einstein's theory of relativity were "pseudoscience/science fiction" until LIGO detected direct evidence of them in September of 2015. Evidence is important. But something isn't necessarily psuedoscientific just because evidence hasn't been found for it yet. Granted, it should be noted that Einstein's theory of relativity successfully explained recorded phenomena were previous theory's failed. So until 2015, gravitation waves were only a conceptual model to explain gravity, not an actual tangible things: much like string theory or multiple universe theories today. --- End quote --- i'd consider accurate models to be reasonable enough evidence. einstein's work was mostly theoretical so it didn't have evidence, but it accurately described behavior that we could test and prove and was also capable of making accurate predictions. i wasn't aware that any existing physics knowledge suggested the existence of other universes tho, if you had a linkle to some more info on that would be neat to hear about. either way the concept of multiple universes doesn't seem to help describe much in our universe so i duno |
| Juncoph:
--- Quote from: otto-san on September 19, 2017, 06:18:25 PM ---i'd consider accurate models to be reasonable enough evidence. einstein's work was mostly theoretical so it didn't have evidence, but it accurately described behavior that we could test and prove and was also capable of making accurate predictions. i wasn't aware that any existing physics knowledge suggested the existence of other universes tho, if you had a linkle to some more info on that would be neat to hear about. either way the concept of multiple universes doesn't seem to help describe much in our universe so i duno --- End quote --- HYPOTHETICAL NOT THEORETICAL AAA |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |