| Off Topic > Off Topic |
| Several Questions: Is "no loopholes" a good rule? |
| << < (51/55) > >> |
| Dreams_Of_Cheese:
--- Quote from: otto-san on September 21, 2017, 02:15:03 PM ---amazing that both source games people chose the most were not developed by valve --- End quote --- lmao. that's kinda telling, aint it? |
| Marios:
Bump. This final vote needs more time. Only 20 votes so far, I'm not going to stop there. |
| Marios:
The votes were cast! The people have decided! The verdict has arrived! Garry's Mod is the Best Source Engine Game, and 15 people can attest to that! Meanwhile, 8 people preferred Black Mesa. What losers. More such 'elections' will be made on this thread, on different topics. Intermission period begins to discuss the results of the poll and rant about the people who didn't vote what you prefer. Next poll will be an ordinary question. |
| Marios:
Did Several Questions died? Well, no, seeing as it's bumped with a new question. As you know, users of usually malicious intent usu- Um, often find a flaw in a rule that allows them to do something that would be prohibited, but due to exact words is passable. This is but one way to create a loophole. Some people simply punish the person who created the loophole as if they had still broken the rule anyway. Others add the rule that ends all loopholes... which is one other than "Loopholes are Banned!" Now, what do you think about this solution to loopholes? |
| Shift Kitty:
You can't just say "No loopholes". Because the loophole existing means the original rule was never broken. A loophole is essentially "Not breaking a rule". If you say "No loopholes", then what exactly would define a loophole as a loophole? Would you just say everyone's guilty? It all depends on where we're defining this rule. When it's on some internet server, you can typically just ban someone for any or no reason, as long as you write it up in the TOS. When it's in the law, it's a really bad idea. It's a better idea to just expand on the existing laws. You wouldn't want to get someone in trouble for using a 'loophole' when they're really innocent. At the same time, someone might find a loophole to avoid the loophole law! So really, it's just bad I guess. |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |