| Off Topic > Off Topic |
| Several Questions: Is "no loopholes" a good rule? |
| << < (52/55) > >> |
| Nonnel:
yeah it would work on the internet or in a dictatorship but in a real legal system it wouldn't work |
| Ipquarx:
"no loopholes" is essentially saying "interpret this the way I intended it to be interpreted." The problem is, if there are genuine ambiguities that aren't obviously exploitable, you still have no way of knowing what the intention is. It just leads to laziness and wouldn't ever work in a legal system. |
| Drydess:
in any official system hell no since that basically makes the leaders be able to decide whether or not someone should be punished for doing whatever |
| |Orange|:
If there are no loopholes, zeroes and o's wouldn't be allowed. They're loops and have holes. |
| Maxwell.:
no because people will find loopholes, and then hide the fact that they are loopholes |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |