| Off Topic > Off Topic |
| [HISTORIC] Boy Scouts to admit girls into their ranks |
| << < (26/65) > >> |
| Nonnel:
--- Quote from: Red Spy on October 11, 2017, 11:05:55 PM ---this is like asking why there's two different bathrooms --- End quote --- i dunno, why are there |
| Drydess:
it's much less expensive to call boy scouts scouts than to improve girl scouts |
| otto-san:
--- Quote from: Red Spy on October 11, 2017, 11:00:14 PM ---nobody thinks it's harmful they just think it's really dumb --- End quote --- right, clearly people put some kind of value in the idea of this organization being boys-only tho. i'm wondering why it actually matters --- Quote from: Red Spy on October 11, 2017, 11:03:24 PM ---how lazy do you have to be to say instead of fixing the girl scouts girls should be thrown into the boy group --- End quote --- am i actually wrong in my assumption that girl scouts is completely different and unaffiliated with boy scouts? it doesn't make sense to assume that you can coordinate between the two unless that's the case. regardless, the girl scouts don't seem like an exact counterpart and still, why is it a problem to allow different genders in? is keeping it exclusive really worth more than the costs of building a nation-wide equivalent to a 107-year-old? i don't see the point. just let more people into your clubhouse |
| TristanLuigi:
--- Quote from: Drydess on October 11, 2017, 11:09:12 PM ---it's much less expensive to call boy scouts scouts than to improve girl scouts --- End quote --- yeah basically although if you rename the "boy scouts" to "scouts" and allow girls in, what do you rename the girl scouts to if you let boys in hm |
| Drydess:
--- Quote from: TristanLuigi on October 11, 2017, 11:10:43 PM ---yeah basically although if you rename the "boy scouts" to "scouts" and allow girls in, what do you rename the girl scouts to if you let boys in hm --- End quote --- "pusillanimous individual cookie wimp scouts" |
| Navigation |
| Message Index |
| Next page |
| Previous page |