Off Topic > Off Topic
[HISTORIC] Boy Scouts to admit girls into their ranks
otto-san:
--- Quote from: Nonnel on October 11, 2017, 11:27:39 PM ---how's it different? girls are getting an obviously inferior experience to boys based on historical presumptions of the differences between lovees
--- End quote ---
addendum: this is why the rules were made, even if people were to no longer believe these things
--- Quote from: TristanLuigi on October 11, 2017, 11:22:31 PM ---and this is starting to sound a lot like "separate but equal" don't you think?
--- End quote ---
addendum: "separate but equal" was declared unconstitutional based on the argument that separate is inherently unequal, which is conceptually relevant here
TristanLuigi:
--- Quote from: Red Spy on October 11, 2017, 11:29:49 PM ---yes i think girls should be in the girl scouts damn i really hate those loving broads
--- End quote ---
you missed the part where the girl scouts are not comparable to the boy scouts in quality or prestige
Red Spy:
--- Quote from: TristanLuigi on October 11, 2017, 11:30:24 PM ---you missed the part where the girl scouts are not comparable to the boy scouts in quality or prestige
--- End quote ---
then fix the girl scouts what the forget
Nonnel:
--- Quote from: Red Spy on October 11, 2017, 11:31:26 PM ---then fix the girl scouts what the forget
--- End quote ---
--- Quote from: otto-san on October 11, 2017, 11:30:10 PM ---addendum: "separate but equal" was declared unconstitutional based on the argument that separate is inherently unequal, which is conceptually relevant here
--- End quote ---
TristanLuigi:
--- Quote from: Red Spy on October 11, 2017, 11:31:26 PM ---then fix the girl scouts what the forget
--- End quote ---
that's 1. not easy, 2. expensive, and 3.
--- Quote from: otto-san on October 11, 2017, 11:30:10 PM ---addendum: "separate but equal" was declared unconstitutional based on the argument that separate is inherently unequal, which is conceptually relevant here
--- End quote ---
EDIT: oop nonnel already got this