I'm glad you found one article where somebody who is at-least not an irrelevant nobody or renowned dumbass to say "gravity doesn’t exist" for the purpose of attention, but it's very clear that you have no idea what this article is saying, because it's agreeing that gravity exists, but saying it is an entropic force as opposed to a fundamental force. It doesn't say anything about my sandwich falling down when I drop it because it's "denser than air", that makes no sense.
Here is the
wikipedia article about the theory, and it is unsurprisingly
very much a theory. It literally says
"The theory of entropic gravity abides by Newton's law of universal gravitation on earth and at interplanetary distances". I'm assuming you're switching your argument over to "Gravity is an entropic force" from "Gravity doesn't exist" now?
You're going to actually have to present your argument in your own words, and not just link to some NYTimes article that is 80% biography and 20% pseudoscience, if you want anyone to take this seriously.
