Off Topic > Off Topic
Saudi arabia said lebanon declared war against them
Juncoph:
--- Quote from: Mouse droidz 21 on November 07, 2017, 12:04:25 PM ---If the US was to nuke the middle east then the world would go into nuclear warfare, meaning the end of the world
--- End quote ---
the only country that would even consider firing back at an american nuclear strike is russia, and the moment they realize that the missile's not headed for them, they wouldn't press the trigger. that being said, nuking the middle east is still loving handicapped, but firing a nuke at a non-nuclear state does not automatically mean global nuclear war - that's just a stupid assertion
--- Quote from: Mouse droidz 21 on November 07, 2017, 12:04:25 PM ---The likes of any country dropping any nukes at the moment is 2.1%, the only country that would have the balls to drop a nuke on someone would probably be North Korea because they're insane but recently Annoying Orange and Kim have been at a bit of a proxy war as they aren't doing anything and are trading insults on twitter like 14 year old children in high school.
--- End quote ---
that's not what a proxy war is
--- Quote from: Mouse droidz 21 on November 07, 2017, 12:04:25 PM ---meaning if they invade a country they want the people in that country to abide by the same rules and polices that the invaders live up to
--- End quote ---
not necessarily
--- Quote from: Mouse droidz 21 on November 07, 2017, 12:04:25 PM ---To be honest Nuclear weaponry is a waste of money and it's just scientists creating weapons of mass destruction in the progress of making tons of cash, they've used their intelligance for the bad of mankind
--- End quote ---
t. high school freshman
1. nuclear deterrence
2. the military industrial complex makes its money off of jets, guns and tanks, not nukes
3. so far the only nuclear strike done in the history of the world resulted in the circumvention of a second D-day and land invasion that would've cost millions more lives
Nonnel:
--- Quote from: Goth77 on November 07, 2017, 05:47:51 AM ---Except the air way up high is much thinner
--- End quote ---
AND WHY IS THAT
RedGajin:
--- Quote from: Nonnel on November 07, 2017, 03:00:50 PM ---AND WHY IS THAT
--- End quote ---
density
Gytyyhgfffff:
--- Quote from: RedGajin on November 07, 2017, 03:04:53 PM ---density
--- End quote ---
TristanLuigi:
--- Quote from: Juncoph on November 07, 2017, 01:29:23 PM ---1. nuclear deterrence
2. the military industrial complex makes its money off of jets, guns and tanks, not nukes
3. so far the only nuclear strike done in the history of the world resulted in the circumvention of a second D-day and land invasion that would've cost millions more lives
--- End quote ---
1. you don't need nuclear deterrence if nobody has nukes [black_thinking_man.jpg]
2. yeah probably
3. Okay this is really up for debate, I would argue the Japanese were going to surrender anyway. Had we allowed them to keep their emperor (which we ended up doing anyway), they likely would have surrendered before the nukes were even dropped. Even so, a prominent official from the Japanese government at the time stated that the surrender was really due to the Soviet invasion of Manchuria, and that the American nukes had little to do with it. And if you think about it, that makes sense - they didn't know about the effects of radiation, and the destruction from Little Boy and Fat Man weren't really that great compared to American firebombing campaigns.